• About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
    • Banking & Financial Services
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Digital & Tech
    • EU & International
    • Food & Drink
    • Green Transition
    • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
    • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
    • Transport, Travel & Logistics
  • Our Team
    • FIPRA International
    • Special Advisors
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
Skip to content

FIPRA

Search for:
FIPRA Network

Back to the future: Biden victory hails return to normalcy in US-Japan relationship

By Philip Howard
Tuesday, 8 December 2020
Back to the future: Biden victory hails return to normalcy in US-Japan relationship

The election of Joe Biden as US President signals important changes in the US-Japan relationship.

President-elect Biden is well-known in Japan from his eight years as US vice president and for his role as Chair of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. He has experienced the changing dynamics of the bilateral relationship first-hand, from the trade tensions of the 1980s-90s to the cooperative relationship today, witnessing how the US and Japan worked well through difficult discussions on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and on regional security during the Obama-Biden administration.

Foreign policy did not feature prominently in the 2020 Presidential campaign, where the emphasis was on managing Covid-19 and the economic support needed for economic recovery. As a candidate, Biden was clear that his other priorities as president included climate and health care.

Based on his foreign policy experience, the president-elect’s perspective will be built on an understanding and appreciation of the importance of US strategic alliances, including the pivotal alliance with Japan. It is also likely that his administration will seek to restore orthodoxy in relations between the executive branch and Congress on trade and foreign policy.

Biden will display greater respect for allies and alliances based on shared values and common interests, as well as his support for established norms of diplomacy.

– Philip Howard, Co-Founder & Managing Director, FIPRA Japan / GR Japan

What, then, can we expect from a Biden-Harris administration with regard to US-Japan relations? We expect the following underlying themes to shape US policy:

A return to normalcy and orthodoxy

President-elect Biden is a career politician, very much in contrast to President Trump. He has a detailed understanding of how the US system works, and how to surround himself with capable people who can execute policies. In that sense, there will be greater stability and a more normally functioning White House and executive branch. This “normalcy” will inform and drive the US’s domestic and international foreign policy.

Biden is now appointing a cast of experienced policymakers in key positions at State, Treasury, Commerce, the National Security Council and the National Economic Council. While there is no clear Japan expert at Cabinet level, some Biden appointees do bring established relationships with Japanese policymakers.

Collaborative approach

Although Prime Minister Abe and President Trump enjoyed a solid personal relationship, bilateral relations under them could be uncomfortable. There is an opportunity for a more amicable, and potentially more productive, bilateral relationship. Biden will display greater respect for allies and alliances based on shared values and common interests, as well as his support for established norms of diplomacy. The emphasis on multilateralism and collective action will also provide new avenues for direct and constructive engagement.

Important role for alliances in security policy

President Obama administration explicitly re-stated US policy on Japan’s territorial issues, including that any attack on the Senkaku Islands by China would invoke a US response under Article V of the US-Japan Treaty of Mutual Cooperation.

During a congratulatory phone call with Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga in November, President-elect Biden committed to this same principle and policy, according to the read-out from Suga’s office. The Biden team’s read-out said that, while the President-elect did not mention the islands specifically, he “underscored his deep commitment to the defence of Japan and US commitments under Article V.” This is a welcome statement for Japan’s security establishment.

The Biden administration will also take a different approach to upcoming negotiations over burden sharing for US military bases in Japan. Where the Trump administration demanded a four-fold increase in Japan’s payments, the Biden team will approach this issue with a more appreciative view of the value of the forward projection of US forces in Japan, and of Japan’s contribution in hosting US bases on Okinawa and elsewhere. This is not to say negotiations will be easy, but that they will start from a less antagonistic framework, with an emphasis on cooperation.

The US and Japan will continue to strengthen cooperation under the existing Free and Open Indo-Pacific strategy, a shared regional security policy to help allies in the region respond to increasing Chinese influence.

Trade

Trade was not a prominent topic during the campaign and campaign materials were very general. However, while Biden has never been vocal on trade, he has consistently supported trade agreements such as NAFTA.

A Biden administration is less likely to use punitive trade measures for leverage against allies such as Japan. Biden trade initiatives – whether bilateral, regional, plurilateral or multilateral – can be expected to emphasise workers’ rights, human rights, diversity, and climate change.

Two of the biggest questions on trade between the US and Japan are the possible resumption of bilateral negotiations and the possibility of a US “return” to the TPP framework.

Prospects for Phase Two of bilateral trade negotiations

Will the US and Japan continue to Phase Two of the US-Japan Trade Agreement (USJTA)?

Phase One, in force since January 2020, essentially provided US agricultural exports the same market access to Japan as the original TPP, plus some reductions in US tariffs on a small volume of manufactured goods and a separate US-Japan Digital Trade Agreement.

Two of the biggest questions on trade between the US and Japan are the possible resumption of bilateral negotiations and the possibility of a US return to the TPP framework.

– Philip Howard, Co-Founder & Managing Director, FIPRA Japan / GR Japan

The governments agreed in principle to negotiations for a second phase to cover trade in a broader range of goods, services, and investment at the end of a four-month consultation period beginning after January 2020. In theory, these talks could have started in May 2020, but they have not taken place, due to other priorities for both governments, not least Covid-19. Given the tendency of new US administrations to start their own initiatives on entering office, and Biden’s preference for multilateralism, it is unlikely that the Biden administration will make Phase Two of the USJTA a priority.

Possible US return to the TPP framework?

Another question on trade is whether the US and Japan will discuss a possible “return” of the US to the TPP, or now its successor, the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).

Biden views the CPTPP as a critical counterweight to China’s growing geopolitical and economic sway in the Asia-Pacific. Yet a possible US return is not a given, and it would not be a straightforward proposition even if it were a priority.

The TPP was a headache for Democrats in 2016. Hillary Clinton did not support it during her campaign despite having done so as Secretary of State. In 2020, candidate Biden did not take a clear position on the CPTPP, and he has still not clarified how he would respond to Japanese (or other) entreaties to join.

This would likely be a Year Two project at the earliest, once the administration has had time to work on the pandemic and economic recovery. However, the world has moved on. Several agreements already go beyond the CPTPP on digital trade, including the US-Japan Digital Trade Agreement and the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on which subsequent digital trade provisions have been modeled.

There is much talk about the USMCA as the new standard for US trade agreements in regard to labor and environment provisions. Democrats insisted on them and this could become an essential element of any Biden administration demands for an updated CPTPP. Moreover, the USMCA sets much higher thresholds for rules of origin (75%) to qualify for tariff benefits, as well as wage requirements. This would be problematic for Japanese auto manufacturers.

Although “returning” to the CPTPP makes strategic and economic sense, given the complexities of a US return, the US and Japan might focus initially on common ground in plurilateral trade initiatives in the context of the WTO. The US could, for example, move forward the e-commerce negotiations, restart negotiations on Environmental Goods and Services, collaborate with like-minded countries to quickly approve a new Director-General for the WTO, or work to reform the WTO’s dispute settlement procedures and Appellate Body.

Implications and opportunities for Japan and Japanese business

There are significant opportunities for the Suga government to establish a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with the Biden administration on trade, climate change, and on regional economic and security cooperation. While it is unlikely that high-profile initiatives will be launched early on, steady work through traditional foreign policy channels, in bilateral, multilateral and regional contexts, will strengthen the economic and security relationship.

In this regard, it will be important for Japan’s government and private sector to keep administration officials abreast of Japan’s regional and global intentions and to identify opportunities for collaboration. With the incoming administration’s focus on “Made in America,” Japanese stakeholders also need to engage the new administration on Japan’s investment in and contribution to US manufacturing, employment, and local communities.

The Biden administration will have different priorities. In particular, issues such as climate change, diversity, inclusion, and gender and racial equality will feature more in America’s foreign policy matrix alongside the traditional focus on common interests and shared values. It is vital that Japanese stakeholders need to grasp this new dynamic in order to engage effectively.

About FIPRA Japan / GR Japan

FIPRA Japan / GR Japan offers a full range of public affairs services, including monitoring, stakeholder and issue mapping, intelligence and preparing professional advocacy resources. Click here to learn more.

Written by
Philip Howard
FIPRA Japan / GR Japan
Profile
FIPRA in Japan
FIPRA in Japan
FIPRA is represented in in Japan by GR Japan, a pioneer in professional government relations in Japan and is the largest public affairs company in the country.
More
Latest News
  • News
    Gerd Götz joins FIPRA as a Special Advisor on Green Transition
    17 March 2023
  • Analysis
    PFAS: rooting ambitions for a toxic-free environment in a manageable process
    10 March 2023
  • News
    Erwin Dhondt  joins FIPRA as a Special Advisor for Health Security
    22 February 2023
  • Analysis
    EU’s small but vital step to shipping decarbonisation: the maritime ETS 
    9 February 2023
  • Analysis
    European Parliament’s New Year Resolution: build a powerful but child-friendly online gaming industry
    19 January 2023
  • FIPRA in Australia
    FIPRA in Australia
    is known locally as Richardson Coutts
    FIPRA in Australia
  • FIPRA in Austria
    FIPRA in Austria
    is known locally as Mastermind Public Affairs Consulting
    FIPRA in Austria
  • FIPRA in Belgium
    FIPRA in Belgium
    is known locally as Greenlane Public Affair
    FIPRA in Belgium
  • FIPRA in Canada
    FIPRA in Canada
    is known locally as Earnscliffe Strategy Group
    FIPRA in Canada
  • FIPRA in China
    FIPRA in China
    is known locally as Yuan Associates
    FIPRA in China
  • FIPRA in Croatia
    FIPRA in Croatia
    is known locally as Vlahovic Group
    FIPRA in Croatia
  • FIPRA in Czech Republic
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
    is known locally as PAN Solutions
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
  • FIPRA in Denmark
    FIPRA in Denmark
    is known locally as European Advisers
  • FIPRA in Estonia
    FIPRA in Estonia
    is known locally as META Advisory Group
    FIPRA in Estonia
  • FIPRA in France
    FIPRA in France
    is known locally as Cabinet Samman
    FIPRA in France
  • FIPRA in Georgia
    FIPRA in Georgia
    is known locally as BGI Advisory Services Group
    FIPRA in Georgia
  • FIPRA in Germany
    FIPRA in Germany
    is known locally as Miller & Meier Consulting
    FIPRA in Germany
  • FIPRA in Greece
    FIPRA in Greece
    is known locally as One Team S.A
    FIPRA in Greece
  • FIPRA in Hungary
    FIPRA in Hungary
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Hungary
  • FIPRA in India
    FIPRA in India
    is known locally as Chase India
    FIPRA in India
  • FIPRA in Ireland
    FIPRA in Ireland
    is known locally as Vulcan Consulting
    FIPRA in Ireland
  • FIPRA in Italy
    FIPRA in Italy
    is known locally as Telos A&S
    FIPRA in Italy
  • FIPRA in Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
    is known locally as GR Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
  • FIPRA in Korea
    FIPRA in Korea
    is known locally as FIPRA Korea
  • FIPRA in Latvia
    FIPRA in Latvia
    is known locally as Meta Advisory
    FIPRA in Latvia
  • FIPRA in Luxembourg
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
    is known locally as Huggard Consulting Group
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
  • FIPRA in Malta
    FIPRA in Malta
    is known locally as Maritimus Company Limited
    FIPRA in Malta
  • FIPRA in Mexico
    FIPRA in Mexico
    is known locally as InStrag
    FIPRA in Mexico
  • FIPRA in The Netherlands
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
    is known locally as Public Matters
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
  • FIPRA in Norway
    FIPRA in Norway
    is known locally as First House
    FIPRA in Norway
  • FIPRA in Poland
    FIPRA in Poland
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Poland
  • FIPRA in Portugal
    FIPRA in Portugal
    is known locally as Initium
  • FIPRA in Singapore
    FIPRA in Singapore
    is known locally as Landmark Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Singapore
  • FIPRA in Slovakia
    FIPRA in Slovakia
    is known locally as FIPRA Slovakia
  • FIPRA in Slovenia
    FIPRA in Slovenia
    is known locally as MC Public Affairs S.a.r.l.
    FIPRA in Slovenia
  • FIPRA in South Africa
    FIPRA in South Africa
    is known locally as Ethicore Political Lobbying
    FIPRA in South Africa
  • FIPRA in Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
    is known locally as Influence Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
  • FIPRA in Sweden
    FIPRA in Sweden
    is known locally as Hallvarsson & Halvarsson (H&H)
    FIPRA in Sweden
  • FIPRA in Switzerland
    FIPRA in Switzerland
    is known locally as Hirzel.Neef.Schmid.Counselors
    FIPRA in Switzerland
  • FIPRA in Tunisia
    FIPRA in Tunisia
    is known locally as Mediterranean Development Initiative
    FIPRA in Tunisia
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as Stamina Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Turkey
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as Stamina Public Affairs
  • FIPRA in Ukraine
    FIPRA in Ukraine
    is known locally as Stober Poltavets & Associates
    FIPRA in Ukraine
  • FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    is known locally as Lexington
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
  • FIPRA in the United States
    FIPRA in the United States
    is known locally as Alpine Group
    FIPRA in the United States
FIPRA Network

FIPRA

© FIPRA 2023.
All rights reserved.

Follow us on Twitter  Find us on LinkedIn

  • Privacy Policy
Explore
  • About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
  • Our Team
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • FIPRA Tools
  • Contact Us
Practice Areas
  • Banking & Financial Services
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Digital & Tech
  • EU & International
  • Food & Drink
  • Green Transition
  • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
  • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
  • Transport, Travel & Logistics
Contact

info@fipra.com

Brussels Office  map
FIPRA International SRL
Rue de la Loi 227
Brussels 1040
+32 (0)2 613 28 28
Company number: 0733.774.811

London Office  map
FIPRA International Limited
201 Borough High Street
London
SE1 1JA
+44 (0)203 805 7770
Company number: 3936157