• About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
    • Banking & Financial Services
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Digital & Tech
    • EU & International
    • Food & Drink
    • Green Transition
    • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
    • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
    • Transport, Travel & Logistics
  • Our Team
    • FIPRA International
    • Special Advisors
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
Skip to content

FIPRA

Search for:
Events

EU-China CAI is an investment agreement, not a panacea

Thursday, 8 April 2021
EU-China CAI is an investment agreement, not a panacea

As part of its Intelligence Series webinars, FIPRA International and the China Chamber of Commerce (CCCEU) co-organised an online discussion titled: “Building a win-win: Exploring the potential of the EU-China investment treaty.”

The event was held to explore the effects of the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) on EU-China trade and investment relations, and on its concrete benefits for businesses on both sides.  

Panellists exchanged their views and discussed the opportunities stemming from the CAI, its ratification process as well as the geopolitical implications the investment treaty will have.

Minister Xia Xiang, Head of the Economic and Commercial Office of the Chinese Mission to the EU, highlighted the CAI will be one of the most influential economic agreements and that once the agreement comes into force, it will certainly stimulate more opportunities for the entire world.  

Given the size of the Chinese economy, building bilateral and multilateral relationships is needed. But it is very clear that economic interests will not prevent the EU from standing up for global values, including, when necessary, the use of autonomous tools.

– Maria Martin-Prat, Director of DG TRADE of the European Commission

Panellists agreed that the CAI reflects a new development pattern and contains provisions which will promote investment to help China and the EU move closer to sustainable development goals and give a strong impetus for the economic recovery after the pandemic.

History has repeatedly proven that when China and the EU are open to cooperation, trade exchanges can develop quickly, and both sides benefit.

Xu Haifeng, Chairman of the CCCEU, emphasised the CAI will bolster the economy, as there is significant room for China and the EU to further strengthen economic ties. Mr. Xu said that with the CAI, China is trying to introduce measures for the first time in an agreement with other countries on state-owned enterprises as well as environment and labour standards, reflecting a shift towards more openness to EU investors.  

He then stressed that the Chinese business community hopes the level playing field in the EU will continue to benefit foreign investors, including Chinese enterprises and that both sides will achieve a win-win situation in terms of cooperation. “Chinese businesses in the EU look forward to the ratification of the agreement,” he added.  

Maria Martin-Prat, Director of DG TRADE of the European Commission and Chief Negotiator of the CAI, explained the objectives of the agreement: addressing the imbalance in terms of market access, helping to establish a level playing field and making sure that the agreement contained obligations related to investment and sustainable developments, particularly in relation to ILO Conventions and the principles and the Paris agreement. 

She highlighted that for the EU the CAI is only one tool within a broader China strategy, which is as complex as the EU’s relations with China. The European Commission, Ms. Martin-Prat reminded, remains convinced that given the size of the Chinese economy, building bilateral and multilateral relationships is needed. But it is very clear that economic interests will not prevent the EU from standing up for global values, including, when necessary, the use of autonomous tools.

The agreement is a milestone in the China-EU relations as the two sides had not updated trade and investment legal framework since 1985, which was challenging due to the huge trade volume and increasing volume of bilateral investment flows.

– Chen Xin, Deputy Director-General of the Institute of European Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

When asked whether she would expect substantial changes to the agreement, Ms. Martin-Prat explained that the CAI is an investment agreement with mandatory rules rather than a political agreement. Despite being discussed within a political context, the CAI is a binding international treaty. Negotiations were finished in December, so technical adjustments are required (like the legal scrubbing of the text) but not reopening of negotiations. 

Chen Xin, Deputy Director-General of the Institute of European Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, explained that the agreement is a milestone in the China-EU relations as the two sides had not updated trade and investment legal framework since 1985, which was challenging due to the huge trade volume and increasing volume of bilateral investment flows.  

As China and the EU are moving towards quality development and sustainability, the CAI will provide a vision for the future investors. 

Ignacio Herrero, Senior Executive Vice President of China Three Gorges, agreed the CAI comes at a time of significant political volatility and uncertainty when the EU is positioning itself strategically. He has seen that in the past 2-3 years Chinese investors lacked visibility and for this reason, the CAI is a very important milestone to set a clearer framework in which transactions can occur.  

When it comes to the ratification, Mr. Herrero admitted there would be discussion but stressed to bear in mind that no other economic region has achieved what the EU has through the CAI. 

Robert Madelin, Chairman of FIPRA International, congratulated Ms. Martin-Prat for her work, as the European Commission has achieved what the EU has wanted to include in the global rule book for many years. It is natural that the CAI is not, and was never intended to be, a panacea for all problems between the EU and China, therefore it is important to recognize that implementing the treaty will be a step-by-step process.  

Mr. Madelin then added that the CAI is a very important step in a very delicate area, and Europe has shown courage in doing it, and now it needs to show similar courage in acting on this agreement.

The CAI is not, and was never intended to be, a panacea for all problems between the EU and China, therefore it is important to recognise that implementing the treaty will be a step-by-step process.

– Robert Madelin, Chairman of FIPRA International

Yuan Haiying, Founder of Yuan Associates / FIPRA China, remarked that the CAI provides very good investment opportunities for both sides. People on the ground already have very good expectations for this agreement.  

On one hand, European companies believe that with the CAI they will be able to invest in China in broad areas and with a level playing field, especially in the areas of manufacturing, communication, aviation, pharmaceutical and finance. On the other hand, the CAI will provide more opportunities for Chinese companies to invest in Europe, which in turn will provide more job opportunities in European countries.

(Written by Giacomo Pizza)

FIPRA’s Trade & Investment Practice

Our team of experts are available to guide clients on the proposed CAI by providing strategic insight, intelligence and advice tailored to your business needs. Learn more about us here. 

Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
FIPRA helps you to navigate the complex trade & investment sector by providing strategic insight, intelligence and advice tailored to your business needs. We also assist our clients in assessing and responding to the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement.
More
Latest News
  • News
    Gerd Götz joins FIPRA as a Special Advisor on Green Transition
    17 March 2023
  • Analysis
    PFAS: rooting ambitions for a toxic-free environment in a manageable process
    10 March 2023
  • News
    Erwin Dhondt  joins FIPRA as a Special Advisor for Health Security
    22 February 2023
  • Analysis
    EU’s small but vital step to shipping decarbonisation: the maritime ETS 
    9 February 2023
  • Analysis
    European Parliament’s New Year Resolution: build a powerful but child-friendly online gaming industry
    19 January 2023
Some of our experts
  • Gerd Götz
    Gerd Götz
    Special Advisor - Green Transition
  • Peter Chase
    Peter Chase
    Special Advisor - EU, International Trade
  • Phil Evans
    Phil Evans
    Special Advisor - Competition & Antitrust, International Trade
  • Ghazi  Ben Ahmed
    Ghazi Ben Ahmed
    Special Advisor - Trade, Development
  • Una O'Dwyer
    Una O'Dwyer
    Special Advisor - EU Economic Governance
  • Christina  Hippisley
    Christina Hippisley
    Special Advisor - Trade, Development
  • Daniel Furby
    Daniel Furby
    Senior Advisor - Healthcare, EU Economic Governance, Health Systems
  • Dirk Hudig
    Dirk Hudig
    Special Advisor - Competition, Green Transition, Energy, Industrials
  • FIPRA in Australia
    FIPRA in Australia
    is known locally as Richardson Coutts
    FIPRA in Australia
  • FIPRA in Austria
    FIPRA in Austria
    is known locally as Mastermind Public Affairs Consulting
    FIPRA in Austria
  • FIPRA in Belgium
    FIPRA in Belgium
    is known locally as Greenlane Public Affair
    FIPRA in Belgium
  • FIPRA in Canada
    FIPRA in Canada
    is known locally as Earnscliffe Strategy Group
    FIPRA in Canada
  • FIPRA in China
    FIPRA in China
    is known locally as Yuan Associates
    FIPRA in China
  • FIPRA in Croatia
    FIPRA in Croatia
    is known locally as Vlahovic Group
    FIPRA in Croatia
  • FIPRA in Czech Republic
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
    is known locally as PAN Solutions
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
  • FIPRA in Denmark
    FIPRA in Denmark
    is known locally as European Advisers
  • FIPRA in Estonia
    FIPRA in Estonia
    is known locally as META Advisory Group
    FIPRA in Estonia
  • FIPRA in France
    FIPRA in France
    is known locally as Cabinet Samman
    FIPRA in France
  • FIPRA in Georgia
    FIPRA in Georgia
    is known locally as BGI Advisory Services Group
    FIPRA in Georgia
  • FIPRA in Germany
    FIPRA in Germany
    is known locally as Miller & Meier Consulting
    FIPRA in Germany
  • FIPRA in Greece
    FIPRA in Greece
    is known locally as One Team S.A
    FIPRA in Greece
  • FIPRA in Hungary
    FIPRA in Hungary
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Hungary
  • FIPRA in India
    FIPRA in India
    is known locally as Chase India
    FIPRA in India
  • FIPRA in Ireland
    FIPRA in Ireland
    is known locally as Vulcan Consulting
    FIPRA in Ireland
  • FIPRA in Italy
    FIPRA in Italy
    is known locally as Telos A&S
    FIPRA in Italy
  • FIPRA in Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
    is known locally as GR Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
  • FIPRA in Korea
    FIPRA in Korea
    is known locally as FIPRA Korea
  • FIPRA in Latvia
    FIPRA in Latvia
    is known locally as Meta Advisory
    FIPRA in Latvia
  • FIPRA in Luxembourg
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
    is known locally as Huggard Consulting Group
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
  • FIPRA in Malta
    FIPRA in Malta
    is known locally as Maritimus Company Limited
    FIPRA in Malta
  • FIPRA in Mexico
    FIPRA in Mexico
    is known locally as InStrag
    FIPRA in Mexico
  • FIPRA in The Netherlands
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
    is known locally as Public Matters
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
  • FIPRA in Norway
    FIPRA in Norway
    is known locally as First House
    FIPRA in Norway
  • FIPRA in Poland
    FIPRA in Poland
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Poland
  • FIPRA in Portugal
    FIPRA in Portugal
    is known locally as Initium
  • FIPRA in Singapore
    FIPRA in Singapore
    is known locally as Landmark Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Singapore
  • FIPRA in Slovakia
    FIPRA in Slovakia
    is known locally as FIPRA Slovakia
  • FIPRA in Slovenia
    FIPRA in Slovenia
    is known locally as MC Public Affairs S.a.r.l.
    FIPRA in Slovenia
  • FIPRA in South Africa
    FIPRA in South Africa
    is known locally as Ethicore Political Lobbying
    FIPRA in South Africa
  • FIPRA in Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
    is known locally as Influence Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
  • FIPRA in Sweden
    FIPRA in Sweden
    is known locally as Hallvarsson & Halvarsson (H&H)
    FIPRA in Sweden
  • FIPRA in Switzerland
    FIPRA in Switzerland
    is known locally as Hirzel.Neef.Schmid.Counselors
    FIPRA in Switzerland
  • FIPRA in Tunisia
    FIPRA in Tunisia
    is known locally as Mediterranean Development Initiative
    FIPRA in Tunisia
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as Stamina Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Turkey
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as Stamina Public Affairs
  • FIPRA in Ukraine
    FIPRA in Ukraine
    is known locally as Stober Poltavets & Associates
    FIPRA in Ukraine
  • FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    is known locally as Lexington
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
  • FIPRA in the United States
    FIPRA in the United States
    is known locally as Alpine Group
    FIPRA in the United States
FIPRA Network

FIPRA

© FIPRA 2023.
All rights reserved.

Follow us on Twitter  Find us on LinkedIn

  • Privacy Policy
Explore
  • About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
  • Our Team
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • FIPRA Tools
  • Contact Us
Practice Areas
  • Banking & Financial Services
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Digital & Tech
  • EU & International
  • Food & Drink
  • Green Transition
  • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
  • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
  • Transport, Travel & Logistics
Contact

info@fipra.com

Brussels Office  map
FIPRA International SRL
Rue de la Loi 227
Brussels 1040
+32 (0)2 613 28 28
Company number: 0733.774.811

London Office  map
FIPRA International Limited
201 Borough High Street
London
SE1 1JA
+44 (0)203 805 7770
Company number: 3936157