• About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
    • Banking & Financial Services
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Digital & Tech
    • EU & International
    • Food & Drink
    • Green Transition
    • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
    • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
    • Transport, Travel & Logistics
  • Our Team
    • FIPRA International
    • Special Advisors
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
Skip to content

FIPRA

Search for:
Analysis

Connecting the Commission’s Smart Mobility Strategy with Digital Europe ambitions

By Erik Jonnaert
Monday, 22 March 2021
Connecting the Commission’s Smart Mobility Strategy with Digital Europe ambitions

As mentioned in our first analysis, the European Commission published a communication last December which presented their strategy for a smart and sustainable mobility system in Europe as an important pillar for how to deliver a carbon neutral economy in Europe by 2050. This strategy also provides a clear timetable on what the Commission expects to be delivered by the different transport modes as soon as 2030. 

It is positive to see how this strategy clearly helps to translate the Commission’s ambitions for a more sustainable and digital Europe into what this means for Europe’s mobility ecosystem. 

In this second contribution, we want to focus on the smart mobility strategy as proposed by the European Commission. The Commission referred to the COVID-19 pandemic which demonstrated the need for a well-functioning single market as well as for a coordinated European approach to transport activities as being essential to address the crisis.  

CCAM, or connected, cooperative and automated mobility, will be at the core of the Commission’s plans to create a fully integrated multi-modal mobility ecosystem, which should also enhance road safety.

– ERIK JONNAERT, FIPRA SPECIAL ADVISOR ON TRANSPORT, MOBILITY

The Commission’s mobility goals – powered by digital

We already see new initiatives being launched by the Commission to accelerate the transition to a digitally empowered Europe, especially the communication published on March 9 to launch Europe’s Digital Decade. 

The Commission’s strategy document of December 2020 mentions fewer milestones on what to deliver by when for smart mobility, except the following: 

  • By 2030, automated mobility should be deployed at large scale; seamless multimodal passenger transport should be facilitated by integrated electronic ticketing and freight transport should be paperless.
  • By 2050, a fully operational, multi-modal Trans-European Transport Network should be in place for smart transport with high-speed connectivity.

The recently adopted Communication on Europe’s Digital Decade has added a milestone to speed up secure, performant and sustainable digital infrastructures, which should help enable connected, cooperated and automated mobility systems by 2030. All populated areas should be covered by 5G. 

Clearly the Commission wants to leverage digitalisation to make connected and automated multimodal mobility a reality: the idea is to allow consumers to travel across transport modes using one single ticket. Core to enabling this will be to leverage ITS – Intelligent Transport Systems. There is currently an ITS directive in place which is up for revision: a new proposal is expected during the third quarter of 2021, based on the recently completed impact assessment. It is clear from past experience that this will again lead to difficult discussions between all institutions and see intense lobbying from many different players. 

The last delegated regulation, which was tabled by the Commission under the existing ITS directive, regulating connected intelligent transport systems to improve road safety by enabling vehicles to communicate with each other and with the infrastructure, was rejected by the Council. The Commission wanted to rely on Wi-Fi-technology for short-range communications while the other institutions wanted cellular technologies included. This incident already demonstrates the urgent need for better dialogue among all relevant stakeholders in the future. This should also facilitate the alignment process between the institutions. 

Methods to help get there

Exchange of data between transport modes will be a requirement to enable multimodality; exchange of data will also be a must to ensure an efficient traffic management system whereby vehicles and traffic authorities and infrastructure are connected and can exchange data.  

CCAM, or connected, cooperative and automated mobility, will be at the core of the Commission’s plans to create a fully integrated multi-modal mobility ecosystem, which should also enhance road safety. It will require also new proposals towards harmonisation of traffic rules and address liability for automated vehicles.  

To help get there, the Commission wants to explore the creation of either a new agency or an existing body to support the deployment and management of ITS and sustainable connected and automated mobility across the European Union. 

Smarter traffic management systems do not only apply to Europe’s roads. The Commission names the roll out of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and the Single European Sky as priorities; this will require further efforts to develop train automation and air traffic management systems through joint undertakings. For maritime, the plan is to further develop vessel traffic monitoring and information systems (VTMIS). 

CCAM will only be made a reality if Europe continues to innovate in this area by developing new technologies and services: funding instruments are in place like the Connected Europe Facility (CEF), the Cohesion Fund, the European Regional Development Fund and InvestEU to enable investment in disruptive solutions.  

The Commission’s strategy is making reference to some of the new technologies in place or underway which will require more attention, such as the deployment of drones and unmanned aircraft and the need to upgrade our digital infrastructure through 5G. This should allow for higher levels of automation across different mobility applications. Reference is made to the deployment of the 2016 5G Action Plan which had as an objective to launch 5G services in all EU member states by the end of 2020 at the latest, which would then be followed by a ‘rapid build-up’ to achieve uninterrupted 5G coverage in urban areas and along main transport paths by 2025. It is clear that these deadlines have not been met: partially due to the COVID-19 pandemic but also by the lack of spectrum assignments by member states. 

As technologies travel across countries, there will be a need to explore a more consistent global approach to enable all these new technologies; this should help create societies where access to mobility is accessible to all citizens while allowing economic operators to offer their new mobility services not only in but also outside Europe.

– ERIK JONNAERT, FIPRA SPECIAL ADVISOR ON TRANSPORT, MOBILITY

Artificial Intelligence or AI will become key for transport automation across all modes, to be supported through testing and innovation programmes to be funded under the Digital Europe programme. High-quality data will be a key factor in improving performance and building robust models for AI systems. The Commission wants to ensure legal clarity in AI-based applications, especially regarding data. Thus, the proposed regulation on Data Governance will help by boosting data sharing across sectors and Member States, while the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has already been a major step towards building trust.  

The road ahead

Following a consultation last year, the Commission will propose a horizontal regulatory proposal on AI in 2021. This proposal will aim to safeguard fundamental EU values and rights and user safety by obliging high-risk AI systems to meet mandatory requirements related to their trustworthiness. For example, ensuring there is human oversight, and clear information on the capabilities and limitations of AI. 

As mentioned before, data will become an important building block in this new ecosystem. For Europe, the Commission will propose actions to build a European Common Mobility Data Space: objective is to collect, connect and exchange data available to meet EU objectives from sustainability to multi-modality. This should be possible while being cyber safe and in compliance with data protection standards. This will require a clear regulatory framework which is currently being drafted: options should be ready for review and consultation with all stakeholders in the coming months.  

DG GROW plans to introduce a proposal on access to connected vehicle data during the 4th quarter of 2021, creating a framework which would allow for access to these data in a fair and safe way to other mobility service providers. This initiative will come on top of other data related legislative initiatives such as the proposal for a Regulation on European Data Governance, introduced by DG CONNECT on November 25, 2020. The idea is to facilitate the creation of European data sharing systems in different policy domains, such as health and mobility. 

Obviously, all these data sharing systems will have to be safe and secure which triggers the need for a robust cybersecurity system: this is managed through the EU Cybersecurity Act introducing an EU wide cybersecurity certification framework for ICT products, services and processes with an oversight by ENISA, the EU Agency for Cybersecurity. This will be completed by a revision of the Directive on Security of Network and Information Systems (NIS 2), which will also cover mobility systems.

The data discussion will require a consistent approach across all DG’s involved in the Commission: Grow, Connect and Move which is in itself already a challenging operation. At the same time, regulators are facing the brute reality that all these technologies are progressing fast, which should force regulators to rethink how to be leaner and faster to get the right regulatory framework in place without getting stuck in the processes and technical details.

While Europe is working on a clear policy & regulatory framework to enable smarter mobility systems across transport modes, similar activities are underway outside Europe, such as in the US, Japan and in China. There will be a need to harmonize some of these different regulations over time. In that respect, we should refer to the excellent work going on within the UN Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) by the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations, who adopted on January 22 this year the UN Regulation 155 on Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management Systems, the first international regulation governing vehicles’ cybersecurity. 

As technologies travel across countries, there will be a need to explore a more consistent global approach to enable all these new technologies; this should help create societies where access to mobility is accessible to all citizens while allowing economic operators to offer their new mobility services not only in but also outside Europe. 

FIPRA’s Transport, Travel & Logistics Practice

Our experienced team stands ready to assist you in understanding and responding to the implications of EU’s Sustainable Mobility Strategy to your business. Reach out to us here.

Written by
Erik Jonnaert
Chairman and Partner
Profile
Transport, Travel & Logistics
Transport, Travel & Logistics
The FIPRA Transport, Travel & Logistics Practice assists clients in understanding the implications of policy developments and advises them on who to engage with, and when.
More
Latest News
  • News
    Gerd Götz joins FIPRA as a Special Advisor on Green Transition
    17 March 2023
  • Analysis
    PFAS: rooting ambitions for a toxic-free environment in a manageable process
    10 March 2023
  • News
    Erwin Dhondt  joins FIPRA as a Special Advisor for Health Security
    22 February 2023
  • Analysis
    EU’s small but vital step to shipping decarbonisation: the maritime ETS 
    9 February 2023
  • Analysis
    European Parliament’s New Year Resolution: build a powerful but child-friendly online gaming industry
    19 January 2023
Some of our experts
  • Derk  Oldenburg
    Derk Oldenburg
    Special Advisor - Telecoms, Transport, Institutional EU Affairs
  • Willem de Ruiter
    Willem de Ruiter
    Special Advisor - Maritime Policy
  • Nathalie Hesketh
    Nathalie Hesketh
    Special Advisor - Travel, Tourism
  • FIPRA in Australia
    FIPRA in Australia
    is known locally as Richardson Coutts
    FIPRA in Australia
  • FIPRA in Austria
    FIPRA in Austria
    is known locally as Mastermind Public Affairs Consulting
    FIPRA in Austria
  • FIPRA in Belgium
    FIPRA in Belgium
    is known locally as Greenlane Public Affair
    FIPRA in Belgium
  • FIPRA in Canada
    FIPRA in Canada
    is known locally as Earnscliffe Strategy Group
    FIPRA in Canada
  • FIPRA in China
    FIPRA in China
    is known locally as Yuan Associates
    FIPRA in China
  • FIPRA in Croatia
    FIPRA in Croatia
    is known locally as Vlahovic Group
    FIPRA in Croatia
  • FIPRA in Czech Republic
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
    is known locally as PAN Solutions
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
  • FIPRA in Denmark
    FIPRA in Denmark
    is known locally as European Advisers
  • FIPRA in Estonia
    FIPRA in Estonia
    is known locally as META Advisory Group
    FIPRA in Estonia
  • FIPRA in France
    FIPRA in France
    is known locally as Cabinet Samman
    FIPRA in France
  • FIPRA in Georgia
    FIPRA in Georgia
    is known locally as BGI Advisory Services Group
    FIPRA in Georgia
  • FIPRA in Germany
    FIPRA in Germany
    is known locally as Miller & Meier Consulting
    FIPRA in Germany
  • FIPRA in Greece
    FIPRA in Greece
    is known locally as One Team S.A
    FIPRA in Greece
  • FIPRA in Hungary
    FIPRA in Hungary
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Hungary
  • FIPRA in India
    FIPRA in India
    is known locally as Chase India
    FIPRA in India
  • FIPRA in Ireland
    FIPRA in Ireland
    is known locally as Vulcan Consulting
    FIPRA in Ireland
  • FIPRA in Italy
    FIPRA in Italy
    is known locally as Telos A&S
    FIPRA in Italy
  • FIPRA in Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
    is known locally as GR Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
  • FIPRA in Korea
    FIPRA in Korea
    is known locally as FIPRA Korea
  • FIPRA in Latvia
    FIPRA in Latvia
    is known locally as Meta Advisory
    FIPRA in Latvia
  • FIPRA in Luxembourg
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
    is known locally as Huggard Consulting Group
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
  • FIPRA in Malta
    FIPRA in Malta
    is known locally as Maritimus Company Limited
    FIPRA in Malta
  • FIPRA in Mexico
    FIPRA in Mexico
    is known locally as InStrag
    FIPRA in Mexico
  • FIPRA in The Netherlands
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
    is known locally as Public Matters
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
  • FIPRA in Norway
    FIPRA in Norway
    is known locally as First House
    FIPRA in Norway
  • FIPRA in Poland
    FIPRA in Poland
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Poland
  • FIPRA in Portugal
    FIPRA in Portugal
    is known locally as Initium
  • FIPRA in Singapore
    FIPRA in Singapore
    is known locally as Landmark Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Singapore
  • FIPRA in Slovakia
    FIPRA in Slovakia
    is known locally as FIPRA Slovakia
  • FIPRA in Slovenia
    FIPRA in Slovenia
    is known locally as MC Public Affairs S.a.r.l.
    FIPRA in Slovenia
  • FIPRA in South Africa
    FIPRA in South Africa
    is known locally as Ethicore Political Lobbying
    FIPRA in South Africa
  • FIPRA in Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
    is known locally as Influence Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
  • FIPRA in Sweden
    FIPRA in Sweden
    is known locally as Hallvarsson & Halvarsson (H&H)
    FIPRA in Sweden
  • FIPRA in Switzerland
    FIPRA in Switzerland
    is known locally as Hirzel.Neef.Schmid.Counselors
    FIPRA in Switzerland
  • FIPRA in Tunisia
    FIPRA in Tunisia
    is known locally as Mediterranean Development Initiative
    FIPRA in Tunisia
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as Stamina Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Turkey
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as Stamina Public Affairs
  • FIPRA in Ukraine
    FIPRA in Ukraine
    is known locally as Stober Poltavets & Associates
    FIPRA in Ukraine
  • FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    is known locally as Lexington
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
  • FIPRA in the United States
    FIPRA in the United States
    is known locally as Alpine Group
    FIPRA in the United States
FIPRA Network

FIPRA

© FIPRA 2023.
All rights reserved.

Follow us on Twitter  Find us on LinkedIn

  • Privacy Policy
Explore
  • About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
  • Our Team
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • FIPRA Tools
  • Contact Us
Practice Areas
  • Banking & Financial Services
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Digital & Tech
  • EU & International
  • Food & Drink
  • Green Transition
  • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
  • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
  • Transport, Travel & Logistics
Contact

info@fipra.com

Brussels Office  map
FIPRA International SRL
Rue de la Loi 227
Brussels 1040
+32 (0)2 613 28 28
Company number: 0733.774.811

London Office  map
FIPRA International Limited
201 Borough High Street
London
SE1 1JA
+44 (0)203 805 7770
Company number: 3936157