• About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
    • Banking & Financial Services
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Digital & Tech
    • EU & International
    • Food & Drink
    • Green Transition
    • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
    • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
    • Transport, Travel & Logistics
  • Our Team
    • FIPRA International
    • Special Advisors
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
Skip to content

FIPRA

Search for:
Analysis

EU Soil Strategy for 2030: Shaping sustainable future requires decisive and concerted action at EU and at global level

By Angel Carro
Friday, 3 December 2021
EU Soil Strategy for 2030: Shaping sustainable future requires decisive and concerted action at EU and at global level

Following intense discussions at COP 26, and ahead of next year’s COP15 on Biodiversity, on 17 November the European Commission adopted three important proposals to review:

  • The existing framework for waste shipment;
  • To minimise the risk of deforestation associated with products placed on the EU market;
  • To improve the quality of soils and ensure its capacity to function as carbon sinks;

EU Soil Strategy for 2030: Summaries of the 3 proposals

Last week, the European Parliament adopted in plenary the new  Common Agriculture Policy  (CAP) legislative framework that the Council is expected to adopt early December, paving the way for the new CAP entering into force in 2023, after the adoption of the national strategic plans by the Commission. The new CAP is the most social and green CAP ever and will make €242 billion available for the period 2023-2027 to shift towards a more resilient and greener agriculture in the EU. 

The EP, the Commission and the Council also adopted a Joint Statement on the application of EU health and environmental standards to import agricultural goods. This Joint Statement is crucially important as it reflects the need to balance well the internal and external dimension of EU policies. The statement calls for “(…) import tolerance for pesticides to be kept under review (…) including (…) substances that are no longer approved in the EU (..).” and recognises the need to engaging proactively at multilateral level. The statement calls also for more international cooperation to improve global food security.

The role of the proposed Soil Strategy in the EU and in the global context 

When announcing the Strategy, VP Timmermans stated that ”The thin layer that lies below our feet is literally the basis for our existence. It is the foundation for 95% of the food we eat. Soil is a living ecosystem that is key for life on the planet and that holds our future.”  For the Commission, the lack of an overarching framework granting soil the same level of protection as water, marine environment, and air, is a major policy gap contributing to the current bad health of soils in the EU. 

As soils host more than 25% of the biodiversity and are the largest terrestrial carbon pool on the planet, protecting and improving soil health in the EU will also help in addressing global challenges such as climate mitigation/adaptation, protecting biodiversity and preserving water resources. In view of this crucial role, it is therefore expected that key elements of this Strategy will be incorporated in the forthcoming communication on Sustainable Carbon Cycles to be published on 14 December 2021.

Unlike recently published communications such as the Zero Pollution Action Plan, the Soil Strategy does not include a comprehensive set of targets for soil protection and management. This is partly due to the fact that not enough is known about soils and biodiversity.

The strategy aims therefore to fill this policy gap by sketching out a complex framework of voluntary and legally binding measures. The key piece of legislation foreseen by this communication is a comprehensive legislative proposal on soil health by 2023.

Unlike recently published communications such as the Zero Pollution Action Plan, the Soil Strategy does not include a comprehensive set of targets for soil protection and management. This is partly due to the fact that not enough is known about soils and biodiversity. The Commission therefore is proposing the creation of a Green Deal dataspace and the implementation of the Horizon Europe Mission “A Soil Deal for Europe”.

This science-based work on data will be crucial to ensure an evidence-based policy making process including to reach a global agreement on soils protection. The international community needs to agree on a common set of definitions, targets and indicators to ensure a fair burden-sharing and a level-playing field. Commissioner Sinkevičius recalled the EU’s determination to continue playing a leading role to drive a more ambitious post-2020 Global Biodiversity framework (to be adopted at COP15) that includes a plan of action for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Soil Biodiversity. 

This science-based work on data will be crucial to ensure an evidence-based policy making process including to reach a global agreement on soils protection. The international community needs to agree on a common set of definitions, targets and indicators to ensure a fair burden-sharing and a level-playing field. 

The Strategy is an important initiative undertaken by the Commission, but it is also a sensitive and complex topic both from the substance and competences points of view. While the Commission is keen to recall the EP’s support for action at EU level (EP’s resolution of 28 April 2021), a comprehensive action at EU level should not  be taken for granted. The Commission had indeed to withdraw in 2014 its proposal for a directive due to Member State reluctance to legislate in this area.

The Commission is therefore making an effort to avoid a similar outcome by committing to carry out thorough consultations, a subsidiarity check and by fully respecting the competences of Member States.  However, as we have seen with the adoption on Monday 15 November of the Council Conclusions on The EU Forest Strategy, following a strict interpretation of the subsidiary principle, Member States will certainly be requesting the Commission to prove the need and value added of taking action at EU level and to avoid duplications.

While Member States are keen to reduce the administrative burden on stakeholders, they will certainly welcome the Commission’s intention to mobilise actors from the food value chain and the call to private funding to reward farmers for carbon captured and sustainable soil management practices. 

Serious attention will have to be devoted to ensuring thorough stakeholders’ consultations. Because of the complexity of the issues at stake, those consultations and impact assessments will need to be well prepared in order to deliver meaningful contributions and to avoid unintended negative consequences. Stakeholders should be ready to engage and contribute actively to such intense discussions with science-based data and willingness to contribute to such important objectives. 

 – Written by Ana Lodoño Botero & Angel Carro

Want to learn more?

FIPRA’s Green Transition, Energy & Industrials practice advises clients in wide-ranging industries from Energy, Environment, Chemicals, Mining and beyond on meeting their climate, sustainability and business goals.

Written by
Angel Carro
Senior Advisor - International Relations, Food Systems & Biodiversity
Profile
Green Transition
Green Transition
FIPRA advises organisations making a green transition, helping firms redefine themselves and adapt their business strategies in sync with the inevitable transformation underway on a European and global scale.
More
Latest News
  • Analysis
    European Parliament’s New Year Resolution: build a powerful but child-friendly online gaming industry
    19 January 2023
  • Analysis
    Drone Strategy 2.0: A vision for the future, actions for today
    12 December 2022
  • Analysis
    Connected but vulnerable: the EU’s plans to ramp-up cybersecurity standards 
    28 October 2022
  • Analysis
    A Forward Look: EU Green Deal key initiatives and their role in securing a green transition  
    3 October 2022
  • FIPRA Network
    Italy general election 2022
    26 September 2022
Some of our experts
  • Eve Tamme
    Eve Tamme
    Special Advisor - Climate, Carbon issues
  • Angel Carro
    Angel Carro
    Senior Advisor - International Relations, Food Systems & Biodiversity
  • Geert Dancet
    Geert Dancet
    Special Advisor - Chemicals
  • Olivera  Drazic-Gaubert
    Olivera Drazic-Gaubert
    Senior Advisor - Green Transition, Energy & Industrials
  • Maria Assimakopoulou-Sorensen
    Maria Assimakopoulou-Sorensen
    Special Advisor - Financial Services, EU Funding
  • Nicola Montorsi
    Nicola Montorsi
    Special Advisor - Energy, Green Transition, Sustainable Mobility
  • Jan Ahlskog
    Jan Ahlskog
    Senior Director - Food, Industrials, Chemicals & Environment
  • Dirk Hudig
    Dirk Hudig
    Special Advisor - Competition, Green Transition, Energy, Industrials
  • FIPRA in Argentina
    FIPRA in Argentina
    is known locally as InfoMedia Consulting
    FIPRA in Argentina
  • FIPRA in Australia
    FIPRA in Australia
    is known locally as Richardson Coutts
    FIPRA in Australia
  • FIPRA in Austria
    FIPRA in Austria
    is known locally as Mastermind Public Affairs Consulting
    FIPRA in Austria
  • FIPRA in Belgium
    FIPRA in Belgium
    is known locally as Greenlane Public Affair
    FIPRA in Belgium
  • FIPRA in Brazil
    FIPRA in Brazil
    is known locally as JG Assis de Almeida & Associados
    FIPRA in Brazil
  • FIPRA in Canada
    FIPRA in Canada
    is known locally as Earnscliffe Strategy Group
    FIPRA in Canada
  • FIPRA in China
    FIPRA in China
    is known locally as Yuan Associates
    FIPRA in China
  • FIPRA in Croatia
    FIPRA in Croatia
    is known locally as Vlahovic Group
    FIPRA in Croatia
  • FIPRA in Czech Republic
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
    is known locally as PAN Solutions
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
  • FIPRA in Denmark
    FIPRA in Denmark
    is known locally as European Advisers
  • FIPRA in Estonia
    FIPRA in Estonia
    is known locally as META Advisory Group
    FIPRA in Estonia
  • FIPRA in France
    FIPRA in France
    is known locally as Cabinet Samman
    FIPRA in France
  • FIPRA in Georgia
    FIPRA in Georgia
    is known locally as BGI Advisory Services Group
    FIPRA in Georgia
  • FIPRA in Germany
    FIPRA in Germany
    is known locally as Miller & Meier Consulting
    FIPRA in Germany
  • FIPRA in Greece
    FIPRA in Greece
    is known locally as One Team S.A
    FIPRA in Greece
  • FIPRA in Hungary
    FIPRA in Hungary
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Hungary
  • FIPRA in India
    FIPRA in India
    is known locally as Chase India
    FIPRA in India
  • FIPRA in Ireland
    FIPRA in Ireland
    is known locally as Vulcan Consulting
    FIPRA in Ireland
  • FIPRA in Italy
    FIPRA in Italy
    is known locally as Telos A&S
    FIPRA in Italy
  • FIPRA in Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
    is known locally as GR Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
  • FIPRA in Korea
    FIPRA in Korea
    is known locally as FIPRA Korea
  • FIPRA in Latvia
    FIPRA in Latvia
    is known locally as Meta Advisory
    FIPRA in Latvia
  • FIPRA in Luxembourg
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
    is known locally as Huggard Consulting Group
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
  • FIPRA in Malta
    FIPRA in Malta
    is known locally as Maritimus Company Limited
    FIPRA in Malta
  • FIPRA in Mexico
    FIPRA in Mexico
    is known locally as InStrag
    FIPRA in Mexico
  • FIPRA in The Netherlands
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
    is known locally as Public Matters
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
  • FIPRA in Norway
    FIPRA in Norway
    is known locally as First House
    FIPRA in Norway
  • FIPRA in Poland
    FIPRA in Poland
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Poland
  • FIPRA in Portugal
    FIPRA in Portugal
    is known locally as Initium
  • FIPRA in Singapore
    FIPRA in Singapore
    is known locally as Landmark Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Singapore
  • FIPRA in Slovakia
    FIPRA in Slovakia
    is known locally as FIPRA Slovakia
  • FIPRA in Slovenia
    FIPRA in Slovenia
    is known locally as MC Public Affairs S.a.r.l.
    FIPRA in Slovenia
  • FIPRA in South Africa
    FIPRA in South Africa
    is known locally as Ethicore Political Lobbying
    FIPRA in South Africa
  • FIPRA in Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
    is known locally as Influence Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
  • FIPRA in Sweden
    FIPRA in Sweden
    is known locally as Hallvarsson & Halvarsson (H&H)
    FIPRA in Sweden
  • FIPRA in Switzerland
    FIPRA in Switzerland
    is known locally as Hirzel.Neef.Schmid.Counselors
    FIPRA in Switzerland
  • FIPRA in Tunisia
    FIPRA in Tunisia
    is known locally as Mediterranean Development Initiative
    FIPRA in Tunisia
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as FIPRA Iletisim
  • FIPRA in Ukraine
    FIPRA in Ukraine
    is known locally as Stober Poltavets & Associates
    FIPRA in Ukraine
  • FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    is known locally as Lexington
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
  • FIPRA in the United States
    FIPRA in the United States
    is known locally as Alpine Group
    FIPRA in the United States
FIPRA Network

FIPRA

© FIPRA 2023.
All rights reserved.

Follow us on Twitter  Find us on LinkedIn

  • Privacy Policy
Explore
  • About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
  • Our Team
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • FIPRA Tools
  • Contact Us
Practice Areas
  • Banking & Financial Services
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Digital & Tech
  • EU & International
  • Food & Drink
  • Green Transition
  • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
  • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
  • Transport, Travel & Logistics
Contact

info@fipra.com

Brussels Office  map
FIPRA International SRL
Rue de la Loi 227
Brussels 1040
+32 (0)2 613 28 28
Company number: 0733.774.811

London Office  map
FIPRA International Limited
201 Borough High Street
London
SE1 1JA
+44 (0)203 805 7770
Company number: 3936157