• About Us
  • Our Services
    • Banking & Financial Services
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Digital & Tech
    • EU & International
    • Food & Drink
    • Green Transition, Energy & Industrials
    • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
    • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
    • Transport, Travel & Logistics
  • Our Team
    • FIPRA International
    • Special Advisors
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Careers
Skip to content

FIPRA

COVID-19 Resources
Search for:
Events

EU trade policy review: crucial moment to safeguard rules-based multilateralism

Monday, 7 December 2020
EU trade policy review: crucial moment to safeguard rules-based multilateralism

EU trade is under review, at a time when the functioning of the World Trade Organization (WTO) is also under challenge, and when international mistrust threatens the very idea of a global economy open for innovation and entrepreneurship. 

Against this backdrop, FIPRA International hosted a webinar titled “EU trade policy & WTO: Open world or return of division?” where distinguished panelists discussed the meaning of the EU’s open strategic autonomy and how international partners see it. 

Trade policy review 

Ignacio Garcia Bercero, Director, DG Trade, set out two challenges that the trade policy review aims to address. The first is how to ensure greater policy integration so that trade policy can contribute to green and digital transition. The second is how the EU should steer the WTO reform process and cooperate with international partners to safeguard multilateralism.

Although it is still too early to tell Member States’ positions on future proposals following the trade policy review, Ignacio did not expect there to be a highly divisive debate as the results of the consultation are in line with those that have been emphasised by Member States.  

Robert Madelin, Chairman of FIPRA International, wanted to see modesty and mutuality included in the new EU trade strategy. In his opinion, mutuality means big players should enable each other to grow and recover, while modesty means that in the new and challenging areas, it is better to insist on coordination and prior consultation as the first step instead of judiciable detailed rules to avoid triggering trade wars inadvertently. 

It’s very clear that from the economic, political, and even environmental point of view, Europe must remain committed to multilateral, rules-based systems — towards open economic policies.

– Ignacio Garcia Bercero, Director, DG Trade

Open strategic autonomy 

According to Ignacio, “It’s very clear that from the economic, political, and even environmental point of view, Europe must remain committed to multilateral, rules-based systems, towards open economic policies.” He stressed that whatever proposals the EU would put forward, they would always be in full compliance with the EU’s international commitments.  

Counting on DG Trade to insist on combining both open and strategic elements into the notion, Andre Sapir, Economist & Scholar from ULB & Bruegel said, “Europe needs to reassert its commitment to an open rules-based, multilateral trading system,” adding that it is a matter of values and the EU should not change.     

How does China see the open strategic autonomy? Stuart Lau, South China Morning Post Europe Correspondent, believed that China’s reaction is not so much on trade but more on geopolitics. “What China is a bit scared of now with a Biden presidency is to see a revival of a Transatlantic Alliance to tackle the rising influence of China.”  

Despite the fact that there are a variety of interpretations on the concept of open strategic autonomy in the US, Peter Chase, Special Advisor at FIPRA International, said that Washington will pay more attention to things that the EU does to search for an understanding of open strategic autonomy. But the new Biden administration will be much more supportive of a multilateral, rules-based approach.  

Robert further added that it is necessary to reassert how important Europe’s open engagement in trade and investment globally is for the continent. “Autonomy should never mean closed” and “strategic autonomy must be consistent with proportionality and non-discrimination,” he said. 

Recovery is about trust. Trusting the economy; trusting that the rules of the game are not changing all the time. I would hope that the trade policy community, not just in Europe but globally, would abide by the same kind of consistent, rules-based behavior.

– Andre Sapir, Economist & Scholar from ULB & Bruegel

WTO reform 

Ignacio highlighted that the WTO reform will focus on three key issues. Firstly, there is a need to restore trust, especially in terms of how the WTO can contribute to sustainable development goals and solutions to restore a functioning appellate body. Secondly, modernisation of WTO rules, and lastly, dealing with the role of state in the economy. In order to implement these issues, the EU needs to develop and work within alliances that have clear objectives to putting forward a multilateral agenda.  

Concurring with Ignacio, Andre added that the countries in the Ottawa group are like-minded countries who believe in the values of the WTO system and are looking to sustain the system. For Andre, the big challenge now is how to make sure that there is a WTO system able to accommodate a wide and heterogeneous group of countries, which necessitates adding new rules to the system on certain issues like state-owned enterprises.   

“It is a big issue how the EU and the rest of the developed world should use the WTO rules to deal with China’s state economy,” Stuart said. Skeptical of bringing market model discussion in the WTO reform talks, China is accusing the EU of paying agricultural subsidies uncontrolled by WTO rules to avoid this market economy discussion. 

Fair trade  

The perception of fairness of the multilateral trading system is a key question. In order to have trust, there has to be the perception of fairness, Peter noted. Governments need to better support workers who are adapting to changes brought by multilateralism. The new Biden administration will go back to free and fair trade putting greater emphasis on protecting workers and raising standards in other countries.

FIPRA’s Trade & Investment Practice

To understand how the ongoing EU trade review may impact your business, please get in touch with our team who stand ready to advise on how to respond to potential risks and opportunities.

Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
FIPRA helps you to navigate the complex trade & investment sector by providing strategic insight, intelligence and advice tailored to your business needs. We also assist our clients in assessing and responding to the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement.
More
Latest News
  • FIPRA Network
    Dutch cabinet resigns: First overview from The Hague
    15 January 2021
  • FIPRA Network
    View from the United States: From impeachment to political reconciliation
    13 January 2021
  • Analysis
    A new era: Examining the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement
    6 January 2021
  • FIPRA Network
    First look: China-EU Comprehensive Agreement of Investment spurs optimism
    6 January 2021
  • Events
    Recovery, regulation & global ties: Portugal’s leitmotiv for Council Presidency
    15 December 2020
Some of our experts
  • Peter-Carlo Lehrell
    Peter-Carlo Lehrell
    Special Advisor - Trade, Competition, Anti-Trust Policy
  • Matthew Snoding
    Matthew Snoding
    Special Advisor - Tax, International Trade
  • Peter Chase
    Peter Chase
    Special Advisor - EU, International Trade
  • Phil Evans
    Phil Evans
    Special Advisor - Competition & Antitrust, International Trade
  • Una O'Dwyer
    Una O'Dwyer
    Special Advisor - EU Economic Governance
  • Daniel Furby
    Daniel Furby
    Senior Advisor - Brexit, EU Economic Governance, Health Systems
  • Dirk Hudig
    Dirk Hudig
    Special Advisor - Competition, Green Transition, Energy, Industrials, EU & International
  • FIPRA in Argentina
    FIPRA in Argentina
    is known locally as InfoMedia Consulting
    FIPRA in Argentina
  • FIPRA in Australia
    FIPRA in Australia
    is known locally as Richardson Coutts
    FIPRA in Australia
  • FIPRA in Austria
    FIPRA in Austria
    is known locally as PANTARHEI Corporate Advisors
    FIPRA in Austria
  • FIPRA in Belgium
    FIPRA in Belgium
    is known locally as Politics Matters
    FIPRA in Belgium
  • FIPRA in Brazil
    FIPRA in Brazil
    is known locally as JG Assis de Almeida & Associados
    FIPRA in Brazil
  • FIPRA in Canada
    FIPRA in Canada
    is known locally as Earnscliffe Strategy Group
    FIPRA in Canada
  • FIPRA in China
    FIPRA in China
    is known locally as Yuan Associates
    FIPRA in China
  • FIPRA in Croatia
    FIPRA in Croatia
    is known locally as Vlahovic Group
    FIPRA in Croatia
  • FIPRA in Czech Republic
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
    is known locally as PAN Solutions
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
  • FIPRA in Denmark
    FIPRA in Denmark
    is known locally as European Advisers
  • FIPRA in Estonia
    FIPRA in Estonia
    is known locally as META Advisory Group
    FIPRA in Estonia
  • FIPRA in France
    FIPRA in France
    is known locally as Cabinet Samman
    FIPRA in France
  • FIPRA in Georgia
    FIPRA in Georgia
    is known locally as BGI Advisory Services Group
    FIPRA in Georgia
  • FIPRA in Germany
    FIPRA in Germany
    is known locally as Miller & Meier Consulting
    FIPRA in Germany
  • FIPRA in Greece
    FIPRA in Greece
    is known locally as One Team S.A
    FIPRA in Greece
  • FIPRA in Hungary
    FIPRA in Hungary
    is known locally as CEC Government Relations Budapest
    FIPRA in Hungary
  • FIPRA in India
    FIPRA in India
    is known locally as Chase India
    FIPRA in India
  • FIPRA in Ireland
    FIPRA in Ireland
    is known locally as Vulcan Consulting
    FIPRA in Ireland
  • FIPRA in Italy
    FIPRA in Italy
    is known locally as Telos A&S
    FIPRA in Italy
  • FIPRA in Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
    is known locally as GR Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
  • FIPRA in Kazakhstan
    FIPRA in Kazakhstan
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Kazakhstan
  • FIPRA in Korea
    FIPRA in Korea
    is known locally as Macoll Consulting Group
    FIPRA in Korea
  • FIPRA in Kyrgyzstan
    FIPRA in Kyrgyzstan
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Kyrgyzstan
  • FIPRA in Latvia
    FIPRA in Latvia
    is known locally as Meta Advisory
    FIPRA in Latvia
  • FIPRA in Luxembourg
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
    is known locally as Huggard Consulting Group
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
  • FIPRA in Malta
    FIPRA in Malta
    is known locally as Maritimus Company Limited
    FIPRA in Malta
  • FIPRA in Mexico
    FIPRA in Mexico
    is known locally as InStrag
    FIPRA in Mexico
  • FIPRA in Mongolia
    FIPRA in Mongolia
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Mongolia
  • FIPRA in The Netherlands
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
    is known locally as Public Matters
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
  • FIPRA in Norway
    FIPRA in Norway
    is known locally as First House
    FIPRA in Norway
  • FIPRA in Poland
    FIPRA in Poland
    is known locally as CEC Government Relations
    FIPRA in Poland
  • FIPRA in Portugal
    FIPRA in Portugal
    is known locally as Initium
  • FIPRA in Russia
    FIPRA in Russia
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Russia
  • FIPRA in Singapore
    FIPRA in Singapore
    is known locally as Landmark Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Singapore
  • FIPRA in Slovenia
    FIPRA in Slovenia
    is known locally as MC Public Affairs Ltd
    FIPRA in Slovenia
  • FIPRA in South Africa
    FIPRA in South Africa
    is known locally as Ethicore Political Consulting
    FIPRA in South Africa
  • FIPRA in Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
    is known locally as Influence Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
  • FIPRA in Sweden
    FIPRA in Sweden
    is known locally as Hallvarsson & Halvarsson (H&H)
    FIPRA in Sweden
  • FIPRA in Switzerland
    FIPRA in Switzerland
    is known locally as Hirzel.Neef.Schmid. Consultants
    FIPRA in Switzerland
  • FIPRA in Tajikistan
    FIPRA in Tajikistan
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Tajikistan
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as FIPRA Iletisim
  • FIPRA in Turkmenistan
    FIPRA in Turkmenistan
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Turkmenistan
  • FIPRA in Ukraine
    FIPRA in Ukraine
    is known locally as Stober Poltavets & Associates
    FIPRA in Ukraine
  • FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    is known locally as Lexington Communications
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
  • FIPRA in the United States
    FIPRA in the United States
    is known locally as Alpine Group
    FIPRA in the United States
  • FIPRA in Uzbekistan
    FIPRA in Uzbekistan
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Uzbekistan
FIPRA Network

FIPRA

© FIPRA 2021.
All rights reserved.

Follow us on Twitter  Find us on LinkedIn

  • Privacy Policy
Explore
  • About Us
  • Our Services
  • Our Team
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • FIPRA Tools
  • Contact Us
Services
  • Banking & Financial Services
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Digital & Tech
  • EU & International
  • Food & Drink
  • Green Transition, Energy & Industrials
  • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
  • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
  • Transport, Travel & Logistics
Contact

info@fipra.com

Brussels Office  map
Rue de la Loi 227
Brussels 1040
+32 (0)2 613 28 28

London Office  map
201 Borough High Street
London
SE1 1JA
+44 (0)203 805 7770

Company no: 3936157

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. To get more info on our use of cookies please see our privacy policy.AcceptRejectPrivacy policy
You can revoke your consent any time using the Revoke consent button.Revoke cookies