• About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
    • Banking & Financial Services
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Digital & Tech
    • EU & International
    • Food & Drink
    • Green Transition
    • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
    • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
    • Transport, Travel & Logistics
  • Our Team
    • FIPRA International
    • Special Advisors
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
Skip to content

FIPRA

Search for:
Events

Harmonising rules, Green Deal funds & innovation needed to boost EU circular economy

By Olivera Drazic-Gaubert
Tuesday, 1 December 2020
Harmonising rules, Green Deal funds & innovation needed to boost EU circular economy

With the European Commission presenting its EU Circular Economy Action Plan in March 2020, stakes have never been higher to strengthen a continent-wide circular plastics economy, including for non-food packaging.

As part of this action plan, the review of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive (PPWD) is now on the table and, among other efforts, it will aim to ensure a well-functioning market for secondary raw materials and reaching compliance with the recycling targets for packaging.

Against this backdrop, Henkel and FIPRA hosted an interactive session in the presence of industry leaders and Brussels policy experts on how to boost the contribution of the circular plastics economy to these ecological efforts.

The main goal of the webinar was to explore the policy and practicalities of the existing proposals in this context, while identifying a common position and next steps for the European industry.

Anna Cavazzini, the Chair of the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) Committee of the European Parliament, emphasized the increasing presence of circular economy debates within public discussions.

If you want to tackle resource use, overconsumption and the climate crisis, we need to make sure that our economy comes more circular. I believe there’s not only a huge environmental impact but also economic advantages if European companies are forerunners in the circular economy.

– Anna Cavazzini, MEP

“I believe that the circular economy is really the main pillar of the Green Deal,” she said, adding, “If you want to tackle resource use, overconsumption and the climate crisis, we need to make sure that our economy comes more circular. I believe there’s not only a huge environmental impact but also economic advantages if European companies are forerunners in the circular economy. At the European Parliament, we’re discussing this matter in great detail.”

Discussions were framed by a recent Center for European Policy (CEP) study which included concrete policy recommendations. Participants were able to build upon ideas in the study together with Dr. Götz Reichert (Head of Department, Center for European Policy), Maja Desgrées du Loû (Policy Officer for Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive, European Commission) and Thomas Mueller-Kirschbaum (Corporate Senior Vice President, Innovation & Sustainability, Henkel).

Close attention was paid to the needs of the EU Single Market regarding packaging, the potential of chemical recycling, the role of digitalization, and EPR schemes in order to push the circular economy forward.

Dr. Götz Reichert, who presented the CEP study, stressed the importance of quality, recyclable materials within the European internal market as the foundation for a circular economy.

“The availability of high-quality plastic recyclates is essential for a circular economy for plastic packaging to work. An EU-wide internal market for plastic packaging lays down the conditions for the free cross-border movement of goods that could promote the economy of scales and cost efficiency, set incentives for market actors, and promotes supply and demand for plastic recyclates.”

Dr. Jan S. Voßwinkel, a scientific advisor with CEP, added that we should have more trust in the strengths of the EU internal market and further harmonize incentives on EPR schemes and fees, for example.

The availability of high-quality plastic recyclates is essential for a circular economy for plastic packaging to work.

– Dr. Götz Reichert, Head of Department, Center for European Policy

“We don’t really have an internal market for recyclates, but we have many small markets, and member states have different regulations. We should try to overcome this fragmentation,” added Dr. Voßwinkel, who is also a professor at the Faculty of Agriculture, Economics and Management at the Nürtingen-Geislingen University of Economics and Environment (HfWU).

He proposed solutions such as a common set of criteria for waste in the internal market. “We could add new standards for non-food packaging, so that we can ensure that we have a common understanding within the EU of what criteria a plastic bottle has to meet, for instance.”

FIPRA Chairman Robert Madelin, who moderated the panel, said: “What would be useful is to establish a common forum where Member States could consult with each other before they set EPR guidelines. It wouldn’t need to be legislated and would redefine the Commission’s upcoming proposal, especially in regard to the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive.”

Maja Desgrées du Loû welcomed the policy proposals outlined by the study and the suggestions for such a forum to be established.

She noted that within the PPWD revision, adopting a definition of recyclability was one of the Commission’s main objectives but noted the challenging nature of this endeavour: “We want to make the definition of ‘recyclability’ as operational and harmonized as possible. We know that rapid innovation is happening both in recycling and in packaging materials. Discussions are ongoing on how to make it work without hindering innovation.”

Smart technologies with smart regulation, complemented by Green Deal funding to boost circularity, can result in a faster pace for the transformations that are needed. If implemented successfully, companies such as Henkel will be able to deliver the strong commitments set by the year 2025 and 2050.

– Thomas Mueller-Kirschbaum, Corporate Senior Vice President, Innovation & Sustainability, Henkel

Highlighting how dynamic, circular economic policy could ideally function and where companies like Henkel could contribute, Mueller-Kirschbaum said: “Smart technologies with smart regulation, complemented by Green Deal funding to boost circularity, can result in a faster pace for the transformations that are needed. If implemented successfully, companies such as Henkel will be able to deliver the strong commitments set by the year 2025 and 2050.”

On chemical recycling, for example, Mueller-Kirschbaum said that the fast-moving consumer good industry could not make the right pull towards scaling up technologies if there was neither clarity nor a good framework. “It is the typical hen-egg problem,” he said.

Madelin complemented these views, pointing out that “we need to ensure that in other parts of the legislative forest, whether it’s REACH restrictions or the definitions of single-use plastics, we don’t prohibit innovation pathways which can be crucial to the low-carbon recycling economy we’re trying to build.”

In a video intervention, Susanne Zänker, Director General, AISE International Association for Soaps, Detergents and Maintenance Products, called on the Commission to employ the revenues collected from the new Plastics Tax to contribute to create a real circular plastic economy, real single market of secondary raw materials within the EU.

We want to make the definition of ‘recyclability’ as operational and harmonized as possible. We know that rapid innovation is happening both in recycling and in packaging materials. Discussions are ongoing on how to make it work without hindering innovation.

– Maja Desgrées du Loû, Policy Officer, European Commission

The revision of PPWD is currently going through a consultation process with stakeholders. The draft final report is expected in April 2021 and the Commission legislative proposal will be adopted in Q4 2021.

The rest of the Circular Economy Action Plan-related initiatives will be released throughout 2021 and 2022. Once the initiatives contained in the plan are launched, it will create both incentives and uncertainties for business models in the EU.

It is imperative for such discussions with experts from industry, academia and politicians to exchange ideas and chart a common course for the future of Europe. It was our objective to use the CEP study as an informative baseline on which discussions – with different stakeholders – could take place.

Public consultation about the EU’s efforts to reduce packaging waste can be found here.

Green Transition, Energy & Industrials Practice

To gain more insights from our discussion, contact FIPRA’s Green Transition, Energy & Industrials team. Watch this space for more impactful webinars on the new EU circular economy.

Written by
Olivera Drazic-Gaubert
Senior Advisor - Green Transition, Energy & Industrials
Profile
Green Transition
Green Transition
FIPRA advises organisations making a green transition, helping firms redefine themselves and adapt their business strategies in sync with the inevitable transformation underway on a European and global scale.
More
Latest News
  • News
    Gerd Götz joins FIPRA as a Special Advisor on Green Transition
    17 March 2023
  • Analysis
    PFAS: rooting ambitions for a toxic-free environment in a manageable process
    10 March 2023
  • News
    Erwin Dhondt  joins FIPRA as a Special Advisor for Health Security
    22 February 2023
  • Analysis
    EU’s small but vital step to shipping decarbonisation: the maritime ETS 
    9 February 2023
  • Analysis
    European Parliament’s New Year Resolution: build a powerful but child-friendly online gaming industry
    19 January 2023
Some of our experts
  • Gerd Götz
    Gerd Götz
    Special Advisor - Green Transition
  • Angel Carro
    Angel Carro
    Senior Advisor - International Relations, Food Systems & Biodiversity
  • Geert Dancet
    Geert Dancet
    Special Advisor - Chemicals
  • Olivera  Drazic-Gaubert
    Olivera Drazic-Gaubert
    Senior Advisor - Green Transition, Energy & Industrials
  • Maria Assimakopoulou-Sorensen
    Maria Assimakopoulou-Sorensen
    Special Advisor - Financial Services, EU Funding
  • Nicola Montorsi
    Nicola Montorsi
    Special Advisor - Energy, Green Transition, Sustainable Mobility
  • Jan Ahlskog
    Jan Ahlskog
    Senior Director - Food, Industrials, Chemicals & Environment
  • Dirk Hudig
    Dirk Hudig
    Special Advisor - Competition, Green Transition, Energy, Industrials
  • FIPRA in Australia
    FIPRA in Australia
    is known locally as Richardson Coutts
    FIPRA in Australia
  • FIPRA in Austria
    FIPRA in Austria
    is known locally as Mastermind Public Affairs Consulting
    FIPRA in Austria
  • FIPRA in Belgium
    FIPRA in Belgium
    is known locally as Greenlane Public Affair
    FIPRA in Belgium
  • FIPRA in Canada
    FIPRA in Canada
    is known locally as Earnscliffe Strategy Group
    FIPRA in Canada
  • FIPRA in China
    FIPRA in China
    is known locally as Yuan Associates
    FIPRA in China
  • FIPRA in Croatia
    FIPRA in Croatia
    is known locally as Vlahovic Group
    FIPRA in Croatia
  • FIPRA in Czech Republic
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
    is known locally as PAN Solutions
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
  • FIPRA in Denmark
    FIPRA in Denmark
    is known locally as European Advisers
  • FIPRA in Estonia
    FIPRA in Estonia
    is known locally as META Advisory Group
    FIPRA in Estonia
  • FIPRA in France
    FIPRA in France
    is known locally as Cabinet Samman
    FIPRA in France
  • FIPRA in Georgia
    FIPRA in Georgia
    is known locally as BGI Advisory Services Group
    FIPRA in Georgia
  • FIPRA in Germany
    FIPRA in Germany
    is known locally as Miller & Meier Consulting
    FIPRA in Germany
  • FIPRA in Greece
    FIPRA in Greece
    is known locally as One Team S.A
    FIPRA in Greece
  • FIPRA in Hungary
    FIPRA in Hungary
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Hungary
  • FIPRA in India
    FIPRA in India
    is known locally as Chase India
    FIPRA in India
  • FIPRA in Ireland
    FIPRA in Ireland
    is known locally as Vulcan Consulting
    FIPRA in Ireland
  • FIPRA in Italy
    FIPRA in Italy
    is known locally as Telos A&S
    FIPRA in Italy
  • FIPRA in Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
    is known locally as GR Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
  • FIPRA in Korea
    FIPRA in Korea
    is known locally as FIPRA Korea
  • FIPRA in Latvia
    FIPRA in Latvia
    is known locally as Meta Advisory
    FIPRA in Latvia
  • FIPRA in Luxembourg
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
    is known locally as Huggard Consulting Group
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
  • FIPRA in Malta
    FIPRA in Malta
    is known locally as Maritimus Company Limited
    FIPRA in Malta
  • FIPRA in Mexico
    FIPRA in Mexico
    is known locally as InStrag
    FIPRA in Mexico
  • FIPRA in The Netherlands
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
    is known locally as Public Matters
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
  • FIPRA in Norway
    FIPRA in Norway
    is known locally as First House
    FIPRA in Norway
  • FIPRA in Poland
    FIPRA in Poland
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Poland
  • FIPRA in Portugal
    FIPRA in Portugal
    is known locally as Initium
  • FIPRA in Singapore
    FIPRA in Singapore
    is known locally as Landmark Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Singapore
  • FIPRA in Slovakia
    FIPRA in Slovakia
    is known locally as FIPRA Slovakia
  • FIPRA in Slovenia
    FIPRA in Slovenia
    is known locally as MC Public Affairs S.a.r.l.
    FIPRA in Slovenia
  • FIPRA in South Africa
    FIPRA in South Africa
    is known locally as Ethicore Political Lobbying
    FIPRA in South Africa
  • FIPRA in Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
    is known locally as Influence Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
  • FIPRA in Sweden
    FIPRA in Sweden
    is known locally as Hallvarsson & Halvarsson (H&H)
    FIPRA in Sweden
  • FIPRA in Switzerland
    FIPRA in Switzerland
    is known locally as Hirzel.Neef.Schmid.Counselors
    FIPRA in Switzerland
  • FIPRA in Tunisia
    FIPRA in Tunisia
    is known locally as Mediterranean Development Initiative
    FIPRA in Tunisia
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as Stamina Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Turkey
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as Stamina Public Affairs
  • FIPRA in Ukraine
    FIPRA in Ukraine
    is known locally as Stober Poltavets & Associates
    FIPRA in Ukraine
  • FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    is known locally as Lexington
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
  • FIPRA in the United States
    FIPRA in the United States
    is known locally as Alpine Group
    FIPRA in the United States
FIPRA Network

FIPRA

© FIPRA 2023.
All rights reserved.

Follow us on Twitter  Find us on LinkedIn

  • Privacy Policy
Explore
  • About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
  • Our Team
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • FIPRA Tools
  • Contact Us
Practice Areas
  • Banking & Financial Services
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Digital & Tech
  • EU & International
  • Food & Drink
  • Green Transition
  • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
  • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
  • Transport, Travel & Logistics
Contact

info@fipra.com

Brussels Office  map
FIPRA International SRL
Rue de la Loi 227
Brussels 1040
+32 (0)2 613 28 28
Company number: 0733.774.811

London Office  map
FIPRA International Limited
201 Borough High Street
London
SE1 1JA
+44 (0)203 805 7770
Company number: 3936157