• About Us
  • Our Services
    • Banking & Financial Services
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Digital & Tech
    • EU & International
    • Food & Drink
    • Green Transition, Energy & Industrials
    • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
    • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
    • Transport, Travel & Logistics
  • Our Team
    • FIPRA International
    • Special Advisors
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Careers
Skip to content

FIPRA

COVID-19 Resources
Search for:
News

Italian elections 2018 – political outlook

Wednesday, 7 March 2018
Italian elections 2018 – political outlook

Mariella Palazzolo from Fipra Italy shared a report on the outcome of 04 March’s Italian general elections.

 

 

 

 

In line with expectation:

  • The centre-right (Silvio Berlusconi’s Forza Italia liberals, Matteo Salvini’s Lega anti-euro sovereigntists, right-wing Fratelli d’Italia and minor centrist allies Noi con l’Italia) was the most voted coalition, with approx. 37% of popular votes, in line with polls’ predictions
  • Anti-system 5 Star Movement (5SM) was the single most voted party.

Contrary to what polls had predicted, however:

  • Lega was the single most-voted party within the centre-right coalition with over 17% of votes, while Forza Italia did not go beyond 14%
  • PD underperformed expectations, recording an all-time low of less than 19%Contrary to what polls had predicted, however:
  • PD’s failure went to the benefit of 5SM, which hit an all-time high of 32%.

Parties’ nation-wide performance had a domino effect in single-member districts, where 1/3 of both the Houses’ seats were awarded – the remainders being proportionally distributed among parties hitting 3%.

  • The centre-right, pulled by Lega, won nearly all districts in Northern Italy. Lega’s performance allowed centre-right candidates to win several districts in the traditionally “red” Regions at the expense of PD
  • The 5SM completely outperformed expectations in the South, due to PD’s very poor result and Forza Italia’s lower than expected performance.

The centre-right coalition has the highest number of seats, but it falls 50 MPs and 21 Senators short of a majority in Parliament. The same goes for the 5SM, which is 90 MPs and 46 Senators far from a majority.
This means that from an arithmetical viewpoint, the control of Parliament can only be achieved through a compromise agreement between parties that have not run together at general elections.
The election of the 2 Houses of Parliament’s chairs, starting on 23 March, will give a first indication to the President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella of parties’ availabilities to reach such an agreement, as long as:

  • In the Lower House, a 2/3 majority is needed in the first 3 ballots and an absolute majority from the 4th one in the
  • In the Senate, a run-off vote between the 2 most-voted Senators is held after the 3rd inconclusive ballot.

In both the cases, an agreement between 2 of the 3 main blocks (centre-right, 5SM and centre-left) will be needed.
Mattarella’s talks with the parliamentary groups to understand their attitude towards building up a parliamentary majority will start on 29 March. On that occasion, answers will be given to:

  1. Whether all centre-right parties support Matteo Salvini as Prime Minister. Lega has the largest parliamentary groups within the coalition, but so far Silvio Berlusconi has referred to Salvini as the new coalition’s leader, but this is not saying that he is the coalition’s PM candidate;
  2. Whether other parties are available to back a centre-right, Salvini-chaired cabinet and allow it winning a confidence vote in Parliamen Salvini would need his entire coalition plus a too conspicuous number of MPs and Senators to only look at turncoats.
    *   5SM would never join a coalition with Forza Italia and would never back Salvini as PM
    *   PD seems unlikely to support Salvini, mainly in the light of his stances on the Euro. After such a dramatic defeat, however, PD might split and part of its parliamentarians might shift their allegiance and side with the centre-right;
  3. Whether the 5SM is available to consider a coalition agreement with other parties, particularly with PD. So far, 5SM leader and PM candidate, Luigi Di Maio has maintained that he will ask PD and Liberi e Uguali to grant external support to his own cabinet – i.e. helping it winning the initial confidence vote in Parliament, without having Ministers appointed in the cabinet and then reaching an agreement on individual pieces of legislation on a case-by-case basis.
    *   Should Di Maio instead accept to open negotiations with PD on a proper large-coalition cabinet (with a shared policy agenda and a shared cabinet team), this would make an agreement with 5SM much more palatable to PD.
  4. Whether PD is willing to support Di Maio as a junior partner. The party leader, Matteo Renzi, said he is not available, but many senior party leaders have already declared in public they disagree and would instead consider granting at least external support to a Di Maio government. Renzi has announced he intends to resign from party leader, but to remain in charge until a new cabinet is in place, thus steering PD’s position during presidential consultations. Renzi’s ability to impose his views on a reluctant party will be key. Factional struggle within PD may be expected in the coming weeks and months, in view of the party conference to elect the next party leader. However, this will not necessarily lead to a party split on an alliance with 5SM, as long as – while a majority of party members are willing to replace Renzi – most of them probably agree that PD should seat on the opposition benches, in spite of the public statements of some of them.
    The scenario under which 5SM forms a government thanks to the support of a PD splinter seems far-fetched, if anything because this appears to be at odds with parliamentary arithmetic. 5SM would need nearly all MPs and Senators elected with PD to win a confidence vote, i.e. it needs that PD as a whole takes the decision of granting its external support to a 5SM cabinet, with only a limited number of dissenting parliamentarians voting against the party’s indication.

Mattarella will take a decision basing on the feedback he receives from all the parties. He will choose someone who he expects to be able to win a confidence vote in Parliament, with neither the leader of the largest party (Di Maio) or the leader of the largest coalition (Salvini) being automatically entitled to take office as Prime Minister.

A German-style large coalition between the centre-left PD and the centre-right Forza Italia (without Lega) can be ruled out: by largely backing anti-system parties (5SM and Lega), voters have proven that this is not an option they would like. The forced coexistence of PD and Forza Italia in the first years of the past legislature is probably a main cause of their electoral defeat on 04 March. Voters would hardly accept a government made of the two main losers of general elections.

Next steps

23 March – Parliament is summoned to appoint the two Houses’ Chairs.
25 March – Elected MPs shall formally register with a Parliamentary group by this date.
29 March – The President of the Republic starts talks (“consultations”) to understand whom to entrust to form a new government, basing on the electoral outcome.
4 April – The leaders of Parliamentary groups should take part in consultations by this date.

Latest News
  • FIPRA Network
    Dutch cabinet resigns: First overview from The Hague
    15 January 2021
  • FIPRA Network
    View from the United States: From impeachment to political reconciliation
    13 January 2021
  • Analysis
    A new era: Examining the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement
    6 January 2021
  • FIPRA Network
    First look: China-EU Comprehensive Agreement of Investment spurs optimism
    6 January 2021
  • Events
    Recovery, regulation & global ties: Portugal’s leitmotiv for Council Presidency
    15 December 2020
  • FIPRA in Argentina
    FIPRA in Argentina
    is known locally as InfoMedia Consulting
    FIPRA in Argentina
  • FIPRA in Australia
    FIPRA in Australia
    is known locally as Richardson Coutts
    FIPRA in Australia
  • FIPRA in Austria
    FIPRA in Austria
    is known locally as PANTARHEI Corporate Advisors
    FIPRA in Austria
  • FIPRA in Belgium
    FIPRA in Belgium
    is known locally as Politics Matters
    FIPRA in Belgium
  • FIPRA in Brazil
    FIPRA in Brazil
    is known locally as JG Assis de Almeida & Associados
    FIPRA in Brazil
  • FIPRA in Canada
    FIPRA in Canada
    is known locally as Earnscliffe Strategy Group
    FIPRA in Canada
  • FIPRA in China
    FIPRA in China
    is known locally as Yuan Associates
    FIPRA in China
  • FIPRA in Croatia
    FIPRA in Croatia
    is known locally as Vlahovic Group
    FIPRA in Croatia
  • FIPRA in Czech Republic
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
    is known locally as PAN Solutions
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
  • FIPRA in Denmark
    FIPRA in Denmark
    is known locally as European Advisers
  • FIPRA in Estonia
    FIPRA in Estonia
    is known locally as META Advisory Group
    FIPRA in Estonia
  • FIPRA in France
    FIPRA in France
    is known locally as Cabinet Samman
    FIPRA in France
  • FIPRA in Georgia
    FIPRA in Georgia
    is known locally as BGI Advisory Services Group
    FIPRA in Georgia
  • FIPRA in Germany
    FIPRA in Germany
    is known locally as Miller & Meier Consulting
    FIPRA in Germany
  • FIPRA in Greece
    FIPRA in Greece
    is known locally as One Team S.A
    FIPRA in Greece
  • FIPRA in Hungary
    FIPRA in Hungary
    is known locally as CEC Government Relations Budapest
    FIPRA in Hungary
  • FIPRA in India
    FIPRA in India
    is known locally as Chase India
    FIPRA in India
  • FIPRA in Ireland
    FIPRA in Ireland
    is known locally as Vulcan Consulting
    FIPRA in Ireland
  • FIPRA in Italy
    FIPRA in Italy
    is known locally as Telos A&S
    FIPRA in Italy
  • FIPRA in Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
    is known locally as GR Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
  • FIPRA in Kazakhstan
    FIPRA in Kazakhstan
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Kazakhstan
  • FIPRA in Korea
    FIPRA in Korea
    is known locally as Macoll Consulting Group
    FIPRA in Korea
  • FIPRA in Kyrgyzstan
    FIPRA in Kyrgyzstan
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Kyrgyzstan
  • FIPRA in Latvia
    FIPRA in Latvia
    is known locally as Meta Advisory
    FIPRA in Latvia
  • FIPRA in Luxembourg
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
    is known locally as Huggard Consulting Group
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
  • FIPRA in Malta
    FIPRA in Malta
    is known locally as Maritimus Company Limited
    FIPRA in Malta
  • FIPRA in Mexico
    FIPRA in Mexico
    is known locally as InStrag
    FIPRA in Mexico
  • FIPRA in Mongolia
    FIPRA in Mongolia
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Mongolia
  • FIPRA in The Netherlands
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
    is known locally as Public Matters
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
  • FIPRA in Norway
    FIPRA in Norway
    is known locally as First House
    FIPRA in Norway
  • FIPRA in Poland
    FIPRA in Poland
    is known locally as CEC Government Relations
    FIPRA in Poland
  • FIPRA in Portugal
    FIPRA in Portugal
    is known locally as Initium
  • FIPRA in Russia
    FIPRA in Russia
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Russia
  • FIPRA in Singapore
    FIPRA in Singapore
    is known locally as Landmark Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Singapore
  • FIPRA in Slovenia
    FIPRA in Slovenia
    is known locally as MC Public Affairs Ltd
    FIPRA in Slovenia
  • FIPRA in South Africa
    FIPRA in South Africa
    is known locally as Ethicore Political Consulting
    FIPRA in South Africa
  • FIPRA in Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
    is known locally as Influence Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
  • FIPRA in Sweden
    FIPRA in Sweden
    is known locally as Hallvarsson & Halvarsson (H&H)
    FIPRA in Sweden
  • FIPRA in Switzerland
    FIPRA in Switzerland
    is known locally as Hirzel.Neef.Schmid. Consultants
    FIPRA in Switzerland
  • FIPRA in Tajikistan
    FIPRA in Tajikistan
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Tajikistan
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as FIPRA Iletisim
  • FIPRA in Turkmenistan
    FIPRA in Turkmenistan
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Turkmenistan
  • FIPRA in Ukraine
    FIPRA in Ukraine
    is known locally as Stober Poltavets & Associates
    FIPRA in Ukraine
  • FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    is known locally as Lexington Communications
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
  • FIPRA in the United States
    FIPRA in the United States
    is known locally as Alpine Group
    FIPRA in the United States
  • FIPRA in Uzbekistan
    FIPRA in Uzbekistan
    is known locally as Kesarev
    FIPRA in Uzbekistan
FIPRA Network

FIPRA

© FIPRA 2021.
All rights reserved.

Follow us on Twitter  Find us on LinkedIn

  • Privacy Policy
Explore
  • About Us
  • Our Services
  • Our Team
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • FIPRA Tools
  • Contact Us
Services
  • Banking & Financial Services
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Digital & Tech
  • EU & International
  • Food & Drink
  • Green Transition, Energy & Industrials
  • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
  • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
  • Transport, Travel & Logistics
Contact

info@fipra.com

Brussels Office  map
Rue de la Loi 227
Brussels 1040
+32 (0)2 613 28 28

London Office  map
201 Borough High Street
London
SE1 1JA
+44 (0)203 805 7770

Company no: 3936157

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. To get more info on our use of cookies please see our privacy policy.AcceptRejectPrivacy policy
You can revoke your consent any time using the Revoke consent button.Revoke cookies