• About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
    • Banking & Financial Services
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Digital & Tech
    • EU & International
    • Food & Drink
    • Green Transition
    • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
    • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
    • Transport, Travel & Logistics
  • Our Team
    • FIPRA International
    • Special Advisors
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
Skip to content

FIPRA

Search for:
Events

REACH revision: Industry should be preemptive, not defensive

By Olivera Drazic-Gaubert
Wednesday, 30 September 2020
REACH revision: Industry should be preemptive, not defensive

With an official decision on whether to reopen REACH — the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals — expected in the first half of 2021, FIPRA International on September 24 hosted a webinar exploring how any potential revision of the landmark regulation may affect industry.

Moderated by Dirk Hudig, Partner at FIPRA International, the webinar featured Geert Dancet, FIPRA Special Advisor and former Executive Director of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

Change to REACH “highly likely”

The College of Commissioners is set to adopt a new chemical strategy for sustainability on October 14 to revise the way chemicals are designed, produced, used and disposed.  

The high expectations of the European Parliament for green chemicals policy, as laid out by the ENVI Committee in June seem to make changes to REACH highly likely. 

Additionally, NGOs have publicly requested the Commission to overhaul current chemical legislation and pass an ambitious chemical strategy for sustainability. However, 18 industry associations call on the Commission not to reopen REACH at all.

Given the pivotal role of the Green Deal, the need for a strong green recovery post Covid19 and the pressures coming from the European Parliament, further action on the legislative front can be expected as from next year. Should the Commission choose for a revision of REACH , its proposal with an impact assessment can be expected within 12 months. If Parliament and Council agree on the changes, an 18-month timeframe plus an additional 12 months to come into force, would be realistic.

One substance, one assessment approach

The focus will be on the risk management side with a “one substance, one assessment” approach. This would require a more comprehensive knowledge of the uses of a substance than what is currently defined. Industry would need to be part of the assessment since they possess detailed information on manufacturing, uses and available alternatives.

The authorization procedure could be simplified for low volumes and low risk while its general complexity could be reviewed and made more efficient and shorter in time. REACH needs some adaptations if it is to be coherent with the circular economy target. The interaction of waste and chemicals legislation has not led to any specific legal proposals while a resource-based approach is desirable.

If REACH is reopened, industry could benefit from a sort of arbitration mechanism on the cost of data sharing.

Expected increase in chemicals ambition

With the EU climate change ambition for 2030 increased to 55%, a significant increase in the chemicals ambition should also be expected. Companies are anticipating these societal changes and are divesting from coal or petroleum based, hazardous substances and investing in hazard-free alternatives.

An intelligent approach would be to not think only defensively but preemptively. To identify ways REACH can facilitate compliance for industry through flexible risk reduction, industry associations should reflect on how to change REACH to their benefit without undermining its intended sustainable ambitions.

The financial mechanisms designed to facilitate industrial adaptation during the green transition should not only finance climate or R&D projects but sustainable chemistry projects too.

Industry and authorities should agree on a definition of chemicals of concern to give certainty for industry on continuous use of a number of less hazardous substances derived from petroleum or coal. The definition of a chemical of concern is extraordinarily important due to the potential related stigma.

Regarding the question on whether revising REACH could be done through amendments to the annexes or a recast, there are very clear legal limitations of what can be altered via these routes and a change through REACH itself would be more straightforward.

In terms of advocacy, a minimum package on which all industry agrees is likely while separate positions for particular types of industries are probable. If REACH is reopened, more industries could be covered.

Industry and authorities have a good tradition of dialogue on chemicals and it would be wise to start reflecting early on the desired changes and start testing the grounds with associations for potential converging interests and develop their own agenda.

On October 14, 2020, the Commission is expected to publish its revised chemicals strategy. FIPRA’s experts in energy, environment, chemicals, industrials and mining stand ready to guide clients through what impact a potential revision of REACH may have on their business.

Written by
Olivera Drazic-Gaubert
Senior Advisor - Green Transition, Energy & Industrials
Profile
Green Transition
Green Transition
FIPRA advises organisations making a green transition, helping firms redefine themselves and adapt their business strategies in sync with the inevitable transformation underway on a European and global scale.
More
Latest News
  • News
    Gerd Götz joins FIPRA as a Special Advisor on Green Transition
    17 March 2023
  • Analysis
    PFAS: rooting ambitions for a toxic-free environment in a manageable process
    10 March 2023
  • News
    Erwin Dhondt  joins FIPRA as a Special Advisor for Health Security
    22 February 2023
  • Analysis
    EU’s small but vital step to shipping decarbonisation: the maritime ETS 
    9 February 2023
  • Analysis
    European Parliament’s New Year Resolution: build a powerful but child-friendly online gaming industry
    19 January 2023
Some of our experts
  • Gerd Götz
    Gerd Götz
    Special Advisor - Green Transition
  • Angel Carro
    Angel Carro
    Senior Advisor - International Relations, Food Systems & Biodiversity
  • Geert Dancet
    Geert Dancet
    Special Advisor - Chemicals
  • Olivera  Drazic-Gaubert
    Olivera Drazic-Gaubert
    Senior Advisor - Green Transition, Energy & Industrials
  • Maria Assimakopoulou-Sorensen
    Maria Assimakopoulou-Sorensen
    Special Advisor - Financial Services, EU Funding
  • Nicola Montorsi
    Nicola Montorsi
    Special Advisor - Energy, Green Transition, Sustainable Mobility
  • Jan Ahlskog
    Jan Ahlskog
    Senior Director - Food, Industrials, Chemicals & Environment
  • Dirk Hudig
    Dirk Hudig
    Special Advisor - Competition, Green Transition, Energy, Industrials
  • FIPRA in Australia
    FIPRA in Australia
    is known locally as Richardson Coutts
    FIPRA in Australia
  • FIPRA in Austria
    FIPRA in Austria
    is known locally as Mastermind Public Affairs Consulting
    FIPRA in Austria
  • FIPRA in Belgium
    FIPRA in Belgium
    is known locally as Greenlane Public Affair
    FIPRA in Belgium
  • FIPRA in Canada
    FIPRA in Canada
    is known locally as Earnscliffe Strategy Group
    FIPRA in Canada
  • FIPRA in China
    FIPRA in China
    is known locally as Yuan Associates
    FIPRA in China
  • FIPRA in Croatia
    FIPRA in Croatia
    is known locally as Vlahovic Group
    FIPRA in Croatia
  • FIPRA in Czech Republic
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
    is known locally as PAN Solutions
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
  • FIPRA in Denmark
    FIPRA in Denmark
    is known locally as European Advisers
  • FIPRA in Estonia
    FIPRA in Estonia
    is known locally as META Advisory Group
    FIPRA in Estonia
  • FIPRA in France
    FIPRA in France
    is known locally as Cabinet Samman
    FIPRA in France
  • FIPRA in Georgia
    FIPRA in Georgia
    is known locally as BGI Advisory Services Group
    FIPRA in Georgia
  • FIPRA in Germany
    FIPRA in Germany
    is known locally as Miller & Meier Consulting
    FIPRA in Germany
  • FIPRA in Greece
    FIPRA in Greece
    is known locally as One Team S.A
    FIPRA in Greece
  • FIPRA in Hungary
    FIPRA in Hungary
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Hungary
  • FIPRA in India
    FIPRA in India
    is known locally as Chase India
    FIPRA in India
  • FIPRA in Ireland
    FIPRA in Ireland
    is known locally as Vulcan Consulting
    FIPRA in Ireland
  • FIPRA in Italy
    FIPRA in Italy
    is known locally as Telos A&S
    FIPRA in Italy
  • FIPRA in Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
    is known locally as GR Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
  • FIPRA in Korea
    FIPRA in Korea
    is known locally as FIPRA Korea
  • FIPRA in Latvia
    FIPRA in Latvia
    is known locally as Meta Advisory
    FIPRA in Latvia
  • FIPRA in Luxembourg
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
    is known locally as Huggard Consulting Group
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
  • FIPRA in Malta
    FIPRA in Malta
    is known locally as Maritimus Company Limited
    FIPRA in Malta
  • FIPRA in Mexico
    FIPRA in Mexico
    is known locally as InStrag
    FIPRA in Mexico
  • FIPRA in The Netherlands
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
    is known locally as Public Matters
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
  • FIPRA in Norway
    FIPRA in Norway
    is known locally as First House
    FIPRA in Norway
  • FIPRA in Poland
    FIPRA in Poland
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Poland
  • FIPRA in Portugal
    FIPRA in Portugal
    is known locally as Initium
  • FIPRA in Singapore
    FIPRA in Singapore
    is known locally as Landmark Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Singapore
  • FIPRA in Slovakia
    FIPRA in Slovakia
    is known locally as FIPRA Slovakia
  • FIPRA in Slovenia
    FIPRA in Slovenia
    is known locally as MC Public Affairs S.a.r.l.
    FIPRA in Slovenia
  • FIPRA in South Africa
    FIPRA in South Africa
    is known locally as Ethicore Political Lobbying
    FIPRA in South Africa
  • FIPRA in Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
    is known locally as Influence Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
  • FIPRA in Sweden
    FIPRA in Sweden
    is known locally as Hallvarsson & Halvarsson (H&H)
    FIPRA in Sweden
  • FIPRA in Switzerland
    FIPRA in Switzerland
    is known locally as Hirzel.Neef.Schmid.Counselors
    FIPRA in Switzerland
  • FIPRA in Tunisia
    FIPRA in Tunisia
    is known locally as Mediterranean Development Initiative
    FIPRA in Tunisia
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as Stamina Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Turkey
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as Stamina Public Affairs
  • FIPRA in Ukraine
    FIPRA in Ukraine
    is known locally as Stober Poltavets & Associates
    FIPRA in Ukraine
  • FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    is known locally as Lexington
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
  • FIPRA in the United States
    FIPRA in the United States
    is known locally as Alpine Group
    FIPRA in the United States
FIPRA Network

FIPRA

© FIPRA 2023.
All rights reserved.

Follow us on Twitter  Find us on LinkedIn

  • Privacy Policy
Explore
  • About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
  • Our Team
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • FIPRA Tools
  • Contact Us
Practice Areas
  • Banking & Financial Services
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Digital & Tech
  • EU & International
  • Food & Drink
  • Green Transition
  • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
  • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
  • Transport, Travel & Logistics
Contact

info@fipra.com

Brussels Office  map
FIPRA International SRL
Rue de la Loi 227
Brussels 1040
+32 (0)2 613 28 28
Company number: 0733.774.811

London Office  map
FIPRA International Limited
201 Borough High Street
London
SE1 1JA
+44 (0)203 805 7770
Company number: 3936157