• About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
    • Banking & Financial Services
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Digital & Tech
    • EU & International
    • Food & Drink
    • Green Transition
    • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
    • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
    • Transport, Travel & Logistics
  • Our Team
    • FIPRA International
    • Special Advisors
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
Skip to content

FIPRA

Search for:
Analysis

What did COP26 do for reducing road transport emissions? The need for a more integrated approach

By Erik Jonnaert
Friday, 19 November 2021
What did COP26 do for reducing road transport emissions? The need for a more integrated approach

The Summit failed to make significant commitments for the decarbonisation of transport, despite COP host British Prime Minister Boris Johnson nominating the phasing out of fossil fueled cars as one of his top priorities for the talks. 

The only bright spot was an agreement made to end the sale of new fossil fuel powered cars in leading markets by 2035 and globally by 2040, undersigned by some countries and automotive manufacturers. But despite all the good intentions of the companies and countries who signed the pledge, the agreement is missing any major impact given that the biggest automotive countries including Germany, US, China and Japan, and several leading Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) did not sign up to this commitment. 

Why is this so important

According to the latest report of the International Energy Agency (IEA), transportation is still responsible for 24% of direct CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Road vehicles–cars, trucks, buses and two- and three-wheelers account for nearly three-quarters of transport CO2 emissions, and emissions from aviation and shipping continue to rise, highlighting the need for greater international policy focus on these hard-to-abate sub-sectors. 

This is the reason why reducing emissions from transport was seen as one of the major themes during last week’s COP26. One of the main objectives at the conference was to align on phasing out fossil fuel powered vehicles by 2040, as announced by the UN’s secretary general, and confirmed by Boris Johnson’s slogan to prioritize on coal, cars, cash and trees in Glasgow. 

However, it is fair to say that the outcome of COP26 was rather weak when you examine global commitments made on transport.  

There is growing momentum among many countries to start tackling emissions from fossil fuel powered vehicles by accelerating the transition to electrification, however, the timetable to sell only zero emission vehicles is still very different from region to region.

Erik Jonnaert, Partner – Transport, Travel & Logistics

Pledges and commitments from countries, regions and companies across the private sector 

  • By way of example, already ahead of COP26, ministers and representatives from some major countries came together to form a new Zero Emission Vehicle Transition Council. The Council was made up of Ministers and representatives from California, Canada, Denmark, the European Commission, France, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, South Korea and Sweden, the United Kingdom. They agreed to work together to overcome strategic, political and technical barriers, accelerate the production of zero emission vehicles, and increase economies of scale. Members of the Council agreed to take measures to boost investment, bring down costs and increase the uptake of zero emission vehicles and the many economic, social and environmental benefits it brings. 
  • The Climate Group launched separately an EV 100 initiative bringing together a coalition of over 100 of the world’s major fleet owners and automotive players making commitments across 80 markets to transition their vehicles to fully electric vehicles by 2030.  
  • In Glasgow, the Transport Decarbonisation Alliance – another coalition of countries, cities, regions and companies launched a global call to accelerate electric vehicle charging infrastructure: the lack of charging points is often seen as a major hurdle to accelerate the transition to electric vehicles and was also used as a reason by some OEMs not to sign a commitment to phase out combustion engine vehicles globally. The members of this coalition underline the need to ensure that there is enough recharging infrastructure available for citizens to be backed by increased investments in electricity networks, in particular smart electricity grids, while putting together a business model for charging vehicles which is user friendly and has a clear and transparent pricing. 

One can conclude that there is growing momentum among many countries to start tackling emissions from fossil fuel powered vehicles by accelerating the transition to electrification, however the timetable to sell only zero emission vehicles is still very different from region to region. 

Already in July 2020, the International Council of Clean Transportation (ICCT) reported that decarbonization policies would be most impactful if they reflect passenger cars transitioning to all Electric Vehicles (EVs) for new sales by the early 2030s, in order to achieve deep decarbonization of the transport sector by 2050. The European Commission has already committed in its Fit for 55 package that all new vehicles to be sold as from 2035 should be zero emissions vehicles (meaning battery electric or fuel cell vehicles). Canada has set similar targets. Within Europe, some countries want to move even faster such as Norway by 2025 or Denmark, Sweden Ireland and the Netherlands by 2030. These are all steps in the right direction but clearly not enough to deliver the climate commitments already made in Paris to keep the rise in Earth’s temperature well below 2°C. 

Further decarbonizing transport will not just be about moving to electric vehicles, while important, this will ultimately not be THE solution. Countries will have to embrace a more integrated approach. 

According to the IEA an integrated, coherent and coordinated set of policies is required to put the transport sector on the decarbonization pathway. Measures at various levels of jurisdiction – national, subnational, within cities or in multi-country regional blocs must spur progress in: 

  • Managing travel demand to reduce the frequency of trips, distances travelled and dependence on cars, and to shift travel to the most efficient modes (i.e. the ‘avoid/shift’ approach). 
  • Improving the energy efficiency (i.e. fuel economy) of vehicles. 
  • Increasing the availability and use of sustainable, low-carbon fuels. 

It will also require a more inclusive approach, by addressing the social aspects of this transition – it cannot be that moving towards more sustainable transport solutions suddenly would deprive access to mobility solutions to low-income countries and citizens. More will need to be done to make public transportation available to more people.  

It will also require a life cycle approach looking at the decarbonization aspects across the entire supply chain 

  • Charging electric vehicles with electricity powered by coal cannot be a better alternative.
  • Decarbonization of transport needs to go hand in hand with decarbonization of energy.
  • Investments in more renewable energy sources will be essential to ensure that transport gets greener across the entire supply chain.

The good news is that a lot of progress has already been made to invest in more renewable energy, especially wind and solar while the prospects for green hydrogen are also optimistic, but it all needs to go faster if we are serious about addressing climate warming. 

The EU seems to be ahead of the game in comparison with many other countries globally, as the plans and strategies are in place to ensure we move to a more sustainable mobility ecosystem. We now need all 27 member states to step up to deliver on these ambitious plans.

Erik Jonnaert

In the final declaration of COP26, countries agreed to phase down coal, a statement which is weaker than expected, but it is at least a clear signal that coal is no longer being perceived as an acceptable energy source. During COP 26, the new Global Clean Power Transition Statement was signed, a commitment to end coal investments, scale up clean power, make a just transition, and phase out coal by the 2030´s in major economies, and in the 2040´s elsewhere. The pledge has 77 signatories, including 46 countries such as Poland, Vietnam and Chile, 23 of which are making commitments on ending coal for the first time. Another signal that phasing out coal has now become mainstream. 

The International Energy Agency estimates that, if the world gets on track for net zero emissions by 2050, then the annual market opportunity for manufacturers of wind turbines, solar panels, lithium-ion batteries, electrolysers and fuel cells grows tenfold to US$1.2 trillion by 2050. These five elements alone would be larger than today’s oil industry and its associated revenues. 

For transport, we will need to act fast, as all scenarios indicate that we can expect continued growth of transport. According to the International Transport Forum (ITF) within OECD, total transport activity will more than double by 2050 compared to 2015 under the trajectory reflecting current efforts. Passenger transport will increase 2.3-fold. Freight transport will grow 2.6-fold.  

The EU seems to be ahead of the game in comparison with many other countries globally as the plans and strategies are in place to ensure we move to a more sustainable mobility ecosystem. We now need all 27 member states to step up to deliver on these ambitious plans.

As always, the proof of the pudding is in the eating! 

FIPRA’s Transport, Travel & Logistics Practice

We assist clients in understanding the implications of policy developments and advise on who to engage with, and when. Learn more here.

Written by
Erik Jonnaert
Chairman and Partner
Profile
Transport, Travel & Logistics
Transport, Travel & Logistics
The FIPRA Transport, Travel & Logistics Practice assists clients in understanding the implications of policy developments and advises them on who to engage with, and when.
More
Latest News
  • Analysis
    European Parliament’s New Year Resolution: build a powerful but child-friendly online gaming industry
    19 January 2023
  • Analysis
    Drone Strategy 2.0: A vision for the future, actions for today
    12 December 2022
  • Analysis
    Connected but vulnerable: the EU’s plans to ramp-up cybersecurity standards 
    28 October 2022
  • Analysis
    A Forward Look: EU Green Deal key initiatives and their role in securing a green transition  
    3 October 2022
  • FIPRA Network
    Italy general election 2022
    26 September 2022
Some of our experts
  • Derk  Oldenburg
    Derk Oldenburg
    Special Advisor - Telecoms, Transport, Institutional EU Affairs
  • Willem de Ruiter
    Willem de Ruiter
    Special Advisor - Maritime Policy
  • Nathalie Hesketh
    Nathalie Hesketh
    Special Advisor - Travel, Tourism
  • FIPRA in Argentina
    FIPRA in Argentina
    is known locally as InfoMedia Consulting
    FIPRA in Argentina
  • FIPRA in Australia
    FIPRA in Australia
    is known locally as Richardson Coutts
    FIPRA in Australia
  • FIPRA in Austria
    FIPRA in Austria
    is known locally as Mastermind Public Affairs Consulting
    FIPRA in Austria
  • FIPRA in Belgium
    FIPRA in Belgium
    is known locally as Greenlane Public Affair
    FIPRA in Belgium
  • FIPRA in Brazil
    FIPRA in Brazil
    is known locally as JG Assis de Almeida & Associados
    FIPRA in Brazil
  • FIPRA in Canada
    FIPRA in Canada
    is known locally as Earnscliffe Strategy Group
    FIPRA in Canada
  • FIPRA in China
    FIPRA in China
    is known locally as Yuan Associates
    FIPRA in China
  • FIPRA in Croatia
    FIPRA in Croatia
    is known locally as Vlahovic Group
    FIPRA in Croatia
  • FIPRA in Czech Republic
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
    is known locally as PAN Solutions
    FIPRA in Czech Republic
  • FIPRA in Denmark
    FIPRA in Denmark
    is known locally as European Advisers
  • FIPRA in Estonia
    FIPRA in Estonia
    is known locally as META Advisory Group
    FIPRA in Estonia
  • FIPRA in France
    FIPRA in France
    is known locally as Cabinet Samman
    FIPRA in France
  • FIPRA in Georgia
    FIPRA in Georgia
    is known locally as BGI Advisory Services Group
    FIPRA in Georgia
  • FIPRA in Germany
    FIPRA in Germany
    is known locally as Miller & Meier Consulting
    FIPRA in Germany
  • FIPRA in Greece
    FIPRA in Greece
    is known locally as One Team S.A
    FIPRA in Greece
  • FIPRA in Hungary
    FIPRA in Hungary
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Hungary
  • FIPRA in India
    FIPRA in India
    is known locally as Chase India
    FIPRA in India
  • FIPRA in Ireland
    FIPRA in Ireland
    is known locally as Vulcan Consulting
    FIPRA in Ireland
  • FIPRA in Italy
    FIPRA in Italy
    is known locally as Telos A&S
    FIPRA in Italy
  • FIPRA in Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
    is known locally as GR Japan
    FIPRA in Japan
  • FIPRA in Korea
    FIPRA in Korea
    is known locally as FIPRA Korea
  • FIPRA in Latvia
    FIPRA in Latvia
    is known locally as Meta Advisory
    FIPRA in Latvia
  • FIPRA in Luxembourg
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
    is known locally as Huggard Consulting Group
    FIPRA in Luxembourg
  • FIPRA in Malta
    FIPRA in Malta
    is known locally as Maritimus Company Limited
    FIPRA in Malta
  • FIPRA in Mexico
    FIPRA in Mexico
    is known locally as InStrag
    FIPRA in Mexico
  • FIPRA in The Netherlands
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
    is known locally as Public Matters
    FIPRA in The Netherlands
  • FIPRA in Norway
    FIPRA in Norway
    is known locally as First House
    FIPRA in Norway
  • FIPRA in Poland
    FIPRA in Poland
    is known locally as CEC Group
    FIPRA in Poland
  • FIPRA in Portugal
    FIPRA in Portugal
    is known locally as Initium
  • FIPRA in Singapore
    FIPRA in Singapore
    is known locally as Landmark Public Affairs
    FIPRA in Singapore
  • FIPRA in Slovakia
    FIPRA in Slovakia
    is known locally as FIPRA Slovakia
  • FIPRA in Slovenia
    FIPRA in Slovenia
    is known locally as MC Public Affairs S.a.r.l.
    FIPRA in Slovenia
  • FIPRA in South Africa
    FIPRA in South Africa
    is known locally as Ethicore Political Lobbying
    FIPRA in South Africa
  • FIPRA in Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
    is known locally as Influence Spain
    FIPRA in Spain
  • FIPRA in Sweden
    FIPRA in Sweden
    is known locally as Hallvarsson & Halvarsson (H&H)
    FIPRA in Sweden
  • FIPRA in Switzerland
    FIPRA in Switzerland
    is known locally as Hirzel.Neef.Schmid.Counselors
    FIPRA in Switzerland
  • FIPRA in Tunisia
    FIPRA in Tunisia
    is known locally as Mediterranean Development Initiative
    FIPRA in Tunisia
  • FIPRA in Turkey
    FIPRA in Turkey
    is known locally as FIPRA Iletisim
  • FIPRA in Ukraine
    FIPRA in Ukraine
    is known locally as Stober Poltavets & Associates
    FIPRA in Ukraine
  • FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
    is known locally as Lexington
    FIPRA in the United Kingdom
  • FIPRA in the United States
    FIPRA in the United States
    is known locally as Alpine Group
    FIPRA in the United States
FIPRA Network

FIPRA

© FIPRA 2023.
All rights reserved.

Follow us on Twitter  Find us on LinkedIn

  • Privacy Policy
Explore
  • About Us
  • Our Practice Areas
  • Our Team
  • FIPRA Network
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • FIPRA Tools
  • Contact Us
Practice Areas
  • Banking & Financial Services
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Digital & Tech
  • EU & International
  • Food & Drink
  • Green Transition
  • Healthcare, Life Sciences & Wellbeing
  • Trade & Investment (including EU-UK)
  • Transport, Travel & Logistics
Contact

info@fipra.com

Brussels Office  map
FIPRA International SRL
Rue de la Loi 227
Brussels 1040
+32 (0)2 613 28 28
Company number: 0733.774.811

London Office  map
FIPRA International Limited
201 Borough High Street
London
SE1 1JA
+44 (0)203 805 7770
Company number: 3936157